Hi,

On 08/18/2014 05:29 PM, Jean-Noël Montagné wrote:
> No. The project is still waiting for developpement. The nlnet
> presentation was a little bit "vaporwared" to attract engineers, but it
> didn't work.

Did it attract nlnet funding nevertheless?

> The engineering problem is not to build a mesh network without
> coordinator in the topology ( according to wikipedia there are more than
> 70 competing schemes for routing packets across mesh networks )

How many of them actually work? In most fashionable fields - and mesh
networks is one of them - people like to propose random ideas to jump on
the bandwagon, without verifying them much.

> it's just to find engineers who accept to work on such a device with the
> minimal feature of text messaging only.....

Was text messaging only a turn-off? It sounds challenging enough
already, under the (reasonable) assumption that most of the proposed
mesh routing protocols are unusable.

Sébastien