Yes, this will be a fun set of merges.

e

-----Original Message-----
From: Libbitcoin [mailto:libbitcoin-bounces@lists.dyne.org] On Behalf Of
Amir Taaki
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 1:03 PM
To: libbitcoin@???
Subject: Re: [Libbitcoin] Proposed blockchain changes

we should transition to s_tec's library anyway.

On 12/08/14 21:32, Eric Voskuil wrote:
> Yes, important. Currently SX has a compile switch to remove the Obelisk
> dependency for this reason. Unfortunately that means removal of all of the
> obelisk-client commands. It will be nice to be able to build SX with all
> client commands and not have to have a local obelisk server/database
install
> (especially for the new single-file package).
>
> e
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Libbitcoin [mailto:libbitcoin-bounces@lists.dyne.org] On Behalf Of
> Amir Taaki
> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 12:28 PM
> To: libbitcoin@???
> Subject: Re: [Libbitcoin] Proposed blockchain changes
>
> Will keep it separate. Some projects don't need the blockchain (like SX).
>
> On 12/08/14 20:31, Noel Maersk wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 05:37:19PM +0200, Amir Taaki wrote:
>>> Beginning now I will begin integrating blockchain database changes
>>> inside libbitcoin_blockchain, afterwards porting obelisk and sx on the
>>> develop branches.
>>
>> Cool.
>>
>> Are you going to make libbitcoin_blockchain a separate database
>> implementation (and a dependency for libbitcoin), or merge the code into
>> libbitcoin and make it a default?
>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Libbitcoin mailing list
>>> Libbitcoin@???
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin
>
>