Fair enough. You'll note I replied while you were writing this, because you aren't the only one who felt I'd been overly simplistic. Which is true; I was half being lazy and hoping someone else would write something approximate to what I believe―I grow weary at times, explaining my thoughts, which I am not always able to condense to a reasonable length, which probably means, as Einstein said, I don't understand my thoughts enough yet, if I may be permitted that reference―and half interested to see which direction this list trends toward, since some of us are more prolific in their writing than others.

―J

> On Jun 3, 2014, at 18:03, Cody R Wilson <codywilson@???> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2014 4:41 PM, "Josh Walker" <josh@???> wrote:
> >
> > Tech is always neutral. It's an inanimate object. It's as neutral as trees or roads or balls of string.
> >
> This is not at all obvious, and (intentionally?) misses the discussion of the originary and essential meaning of technology.
>
> We have asked the question concerning technology. Let's pursue it: http://bit.ly/U9RS1J
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem