'I have a way to ensure reputation is always kept with identity.'
Can you elaborate a bit more? Is the reputation kept on chain?
'I don't have a way to prevent reputation spam though without costing the
person leaving reputation (not a good incentive structure).'
If someone does something bad, can't we just have everyone start ignoring
their fidelity bond? Forcing them to repay another bond under a different
identity?
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote:
> I have a way to ensure reputation is always kept with identity.
>
> I don't have a way to prevent reputation spam though without costing the
> person leaving reputation (not a good incentive structure).
>
> On 05/20/2014 12:56 AM, Sidney Zhang wrote:
> > It means that it is extremely expensive to mine identity. So a better
> > reputation system can now be built as well.
> >
> > Are there any good examples of implementations?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Liad Shababo <liad@???
> > <mailto:liad@shababo.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't make them trustworthy. It shows they value that identity and
> > would be hesitant to do anything to ruin it thereby rendering their
> > financial sacrifice meaningless
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 19 May 2014, at 20:19, "Anthony D'Onofrio" <iamtexture@???
> > <mailto:iamtexture@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> How does lighting money on fire make someone trustworthy?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:42 AM, Peter Todd <pete@???
> >> <mailto:pete@petertodd.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >
> >
> > On 19 May 2014 16:39:06 CEST, Robert Williamson
> > <bobalot@??? <mailto:bobalot@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>Doesn't op return outputs need to have a value of 0?
> >
> > No, they can be any value.
> >
> >>There's other concerns too. If we count someone as
> > trustworthy because
> >>they
> >>have sacrificed some amount of money to fees, its easy for
> > mining pools
> >>to
> >>start creating identities where a lot of fees are sacrificed to
> >>themselves.
> >
> > That's what I mean by fee sacrifices encouraging mining pool
> > centralisation. Right now I think that should rule out
> > sacrifice to fees completely.
> >
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> Anthony D'Onofrio
> >> iamtexture@??? <mailto:iamtexture@gmail.com>
> >> 501.681.3225 <tel:501.681.3225>
> >> -
> >> Chaos Collider - Dream. Design. Develop. Deploy.
> >> http://www.chaoscollider.com
> >> -
> >> Peace.Love.Human.
> >> http://www.peacelovehuman.org
> >>
> >> "Don't ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes
> >> you come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs
> >> is people who have come alive." - Howard Thurman
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> >
> > Sidney Zhang
> >
> > Mobile: +1 415 767 8831
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
--
Kind regards,
Sidney Zhang
Mobile: +1 415 767 8831
::
Re: [unSYSTEM] Proof of Burn ==> Tr…
