@mario
Great idea. The money in the Wallet could be stored in the bank of Ideas. The more "money" is put to An idea the more chance iT gets to become opperational. But All users rich or poor Should have the Same "voting" power.

Anyone familiair with "the bank of favors"?

http://www.favourbank.eu


Middelerwijl een schoon wees
gegroet,
Marvin Fernandes
0624559753


Verstuurd vanaf mijn Sinclair Spectrum

> Op 12 mei 2014 om 00:21 heeft "Mario Jefferson" <m.jefferson.001@???> het volgende geschreven:
>
> Great idea Adam. You think as I do. I also have been kicking around these kinds of ideas IMO this platform basically boiled down to a massive conversation platform whereby users of this platform could, by way user managed meta data ie personal block chain and 'file' in on a conversation.
>
> Guilds could form whereby schools of particular thought regarding the issue can way in and persons could vote. Pretty much as you listed the only kicker IMO is the. GUI a real time visualizer that sorts out everything smartly. What do you think
>
> Sent using CloudMagic
>
> On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote:
> https://wiki.unsystem.net/index.php/Bitlaw
>
> On 10/05/14 18:39, Adam B. Levine wrote:
> > Hey all,
> > I've been spinning on this concept recently and thought it would be a
> > good conversation with this group.
> >
> > labs.humint.is/politik/ <http://labs.humint.is/politik/>
> >
> > *An Accountable Representative Decision Making & Leadership System*
> >
> > by Adam B. Levine <http://twitter.com/gamerandy>
> >
> > When we talk about Bitcoin or cryptocurrency, it is usually in the
> > context of money. Sometimes it is in the form of stake, but this stake
> > is usually acquired through some work or for funds donated. Politik is a
> > system which recasts the metaphor of token from Coin to Voice - the
> > ability to influence an outcome by making your “voice” heard.
> >
> > This contrasts with the systems of the world today, voting is a process
> > of the very slightly larger group getting their way while the smaller
> > group does not. These “groups” as individuals are not represented at
> > all, the one time they interact with their representative is during
> > their periodic election. Once in office, they have the power to do as
> > they will in the name of representing those constituents and the only
> > alternative is the most-extreme recall election which even if successful
> > only returns a different person to the same predictable predicament.
> >
> > The problem is no accountability, voters are locked in once the decision
> > is made. This made sense in the days of horseback travel, but in a
> > post-bitcoin world this idea is preposterous. Accountability is
> > necessary all the time, and applying the metaphors and tools of Bitcoin
> > we can achieve it.
> >
> > Imagine a cryptocurrency wallet that contains bitcoins, other
> > cryptocurrencies and a category of tokens called (poli)”Tiks” - For each
> > elected position you normally vote for, you have a purpose specific tik.
> > You can send these but they will return to the original owner after a
> > pre-set period of time. This is user-defined, the default would probably
> > be 2 years.
> >
> > There is also a “panic button” that recalls a specific tik if the person
> > imbued with it is doing something you find so onerous you want to pull
> > your support from them completely.
> >
> > When laws are being voted on or decisions made, representatives send
> > their own coin to the bill, either for or against and the weight of all
> > the constituents tokens represent the total weight of the
> > representatives vote. Unlike constituent tokens the default would be
> > less than an hour, just long enough to validate and provide an anti-spam
> > mechanism against legislating too fast.
> >
> > This effect of tiks in a constituents wallet “weighting” their own tik
> > does not just have to be one layer deep. If I don’t follow national
> > politics but my friend Bob does and we generally agree, I can send my
> > tik to Bob and then when he sends his tik to the Anthony, (the candidate
> > he thinks is most valuable to support) Bobs vote is worth the same as if
> > Anthony had sent his and I had also sent mine, except I just got to
> > automatically do what Bob did.
> >
> > Bob might not know himself, he could give it to his favorite political
> > pundit who then would have more power with candidates since they
> > literally represent the voice of their listeners.
> >
> > For constituents this is very simple, they send their tiks as they see
> > fit and can forget about them. If the representative steps out of line
> > enough for the constituents to realize it, all they have to do is press
> > the panic button and it actually reduces the power of the out-of-line
> > representative.
> >
> > That voice freshly in the possession of enraged constituents can then
> > find its way to a different representative who is more accurately
> > adhering to whatever principle their own rep is not. This can result in
> > lasting gains for that representative as the new supporters might not
> > take the pro-active step of returning it to the offending rep.
> >
> > Similarly, if I have placed my tik with a political pundit or my friend
> > and they do not withdraw their own token in support, I can choose to
> > withdraw my token from them which has the impact of reducing their power
> > as well.
> >
> > The natural incentive in this situation will be for unpopular positions
> > to be abandoned at all levels of the structure because the longer you
> > wait, the more constituents will leave many of whom will not return
> >
> > This also removes the need for “recall” elections, representatives who
> > alienate their constituents will find their votes still being recorded
> > but not carrying any weight in the decision. They will render themselves
> > irrelevant. If the new representatives imbued with power become bad
> > actors, it will vacate their vessel just as quickly.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem