:: Re: [unSYSTEM] SX: GUI and charity …
Inizio della pagina
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autore: Kristov Atlas
Data:  
To: System undo crew
Oggetto: Re: [unSYSTEM] SX: GUI and charity outputting (donations for Sean's Outpost, unSYSTEM etc)
Nice work! This cypherpunk wrote code.

-Kristov

On 05/06/2014 11:59 PM, Washington Sanchez wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> For a little while now I've been working on creating a simple GUI for
> SX (launched from a script: sx-gui.sh), as it is one of the most
> powerful Bitcoin utility tools out there. I really think this should
> have broader adoption but some some folks may be intimidated by the
> command line interface, even though I know it is targeted for the
> system administrator.
>
> The GUI is nothing special, just using Zenity, which wraps commands in
> the terminal to GTK+ dialog boxes in Linux. It hasn't been fully
> completed yet (importantly I need to GUI the last step of signing and
> broadcasting transactions), but I've already GUI'd a lot of the
> functionality of SX.
>
> https://github.com/spesmilo/sx/tree/develop/tools
>
> Something I want to highlight is that for creating unsigned offline
> transactions, I have added the toption to include what I'm calling a
> 'charity output' that will send the equivalent of a transaction fee
> (0.1 mBTC) to a charity or organisation from a preselected list.
>
>
>
> So far I've included the following charities/organisation: Sean's
> Outpost, Wikileaks, unSYSTEM, Satoshi Nakamoto Institute, TOR project,
> Free Software Foundation.
>
> My aim in this is to do a proof of concept for broad scale donations
> to be made using other bitcoin clients... hopefully *DarkWallet*.
>
> Roughly 12-14 BTC is collected *every day* in transaction fees (and
> these are the early days of Bitcoin). If charity outputting captured
> even 1% of this amount, it would benefit both /people /and /Bitcoin
> /tremendously. Charity outputting has low marginal costs for the
> individual and yet a huge potential to scale if implemented even on a
> handful of clients.
>
> In terms of press for Bitcoin, now the network would be supporting
> helpless and needy, funding and kickstarting projects, and supporting
> worthwhile causes of the day. Also, regulating or suppressing Bitcoin
> threatens to stop feeding starving children around the world, rather
> than stopping a mid-20s white kid from getting high. Of course, this
> isn't the primary or even secondary motivation to do this, rather
> _helping people is_, but it is auxiliary benefit.
>
> Some positive and negative factors to consider:
>
>  1. Mining pools can favor (conversely punish) transactions with a
>     charitable output
>  2. Auditing of organisations that are included into the default list
>     of charitable outputs would have to step up (needs to already)
>  3. On the negative side, this may give too much power in the hands of
>     developers in terms of who makes the list or who doesn't... adding
>     the ability for users to add organisation to this list seems very
>     important in terms of development and awareness.
>  4. People may not want to donate larger amounts of bitcoin to
>     organisations if they opt to fund via charity outputting... this
>     may be mitigated by sites devoted to tracking charitable
>     outputting to inform the community.
>  5. Validating that the addresses on the charitable outputs are/remain
>     controlled by the organisations... multi-signature addresses seem
>     to be a *must *here.
>       * At the moment, only unSYSTEM is making use of them.
>       * Plus organisations such as Wikileaks, SNI and TOR issue
>         addresses on a per user basis, so you shouldn't trust the
>         addresses I put down in the code until these organisations
>         have publicly proved that they control them.
>       * Using stealth addresses via DarkWallet may be a good idea
>         (purely in terms of key management from the organisation's
>         POV), but then it becomes difficult to audit.

>
> I really welcome feedback to discover whether this is a good, bad, or
> needs improvement idea... hopefully, whatever the answer is, some
> people in need get helped as a result.
>
> -- drwasho
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem