:: Re: [unSYSTEM] rename darkmarket...…
Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: John Hebert
Data:  
A: System undo crew
Assumpte: Re: [unSYSTEM] rename darkmarket... our response.
I'm not sure what you are asking. Are you asking what happens if someone
uses Dark Market / Dark Wallet to "cheat" the bitcoin system?

John


On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Thomas Hartman
<thomas@???>wrote:

> BTW, I'm not taking a stand here.
>
> I'm literally asking, what happens. From a public relations standpoint, if
> for no other reason.
>
> Because it seems to me a question of when, not if.
>
> In this case, alice could well be an agent of Circle in amir's evil
> conspiracy scenario, or pick your adversary.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Hartman <
> thomas@???> wrote:
>
>> What happens when alice doesn't free the baby?
>>
>> http://friedo.szm.com/krypto/AC/ch06/06-09.html
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 10:57 AM, John Hebert <johnalexhebert@???>wrote:
>>
>>> Please don't think of this as a personal attack, but using the term
>>> "public relations" in relation to an UnSystem project shows a serious
>>> misunderstanding of the basic principals of anarchism and libertarianism.
>>> Bowing to public pressure for acceptance means you have already given up
>>> the ideals behind the project.
>>>
>>> I'll keep repeating this for those who want to rename "Dark Market" to
>>> "Free Market": fork it, rename it, maintain it.
>>>
>>> No capitulation, no compromises.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Peter Todd <pete@???> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 03:25:40AM +0100, Amir Taaki wrote:
>>>> > upvote this vid plz for visibility,
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/23vo5s/petition_to_change_the_name_of_dark_market_to/ch1e6qb
>>>>
>>>> Brilliant video.
>>>>
>>>> That said, the suggestion to call it "Free Market" is clever enough PR
>>>> I'd seriously consider it. Unlike the bs around renaming "stealth
>>>> addresses" "reusable addresses" the PR you could generate by doing so
>>>> would probably be more than enough to make up for the confusion caused
>>>> by the name-change.
>>>>
>>>> Don't make the mistake of getting too predictable.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
>>>> 00000000000000003e4169d0cffdad1acd4a67ad9ec79786a53066511f305e72
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>