We (cloudtech, internetpartiet Danmark) thought about this a long time ago.
As we see it, the answer to these questions is liquid democracy. We built
the site: internetpartiet.nu
There is still some programming left to do, but Marhias is very busy with
Ethereum these days.
But in this respect, the blockchain and Ethereum will be very usefull.
I do not want to take any credit here. The whole concept was thought up by
Marhias Grønnebæk.
But if you would like to hear more just write me.

Den mandag den 31. marts 2014 skrev Pavol Luptak
<wilder@???<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wilder@???');>
>:

> On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 09:36:34AM +0200, Caleb James DeLisle wrote:
> > On this topic, I think we fundamentally disagree. The problem I see with
> > Anarchist/Libertarian systems is they allow centralization of power and
> > are eventually self-destructive. The obvious example of
> power-centralization
>
> This is a false assumption.
> Authoritative systems (like democracy) support centralization of power
> thanks
> to the monopoly of legal system / army / police etc.
>
> Technically it is more cheaper for rich people to lobby / corrupt
> the current government's monopoly than to corrupt all legal systems /
> policies / ... in the decentralized freemarket anarchist system (it's more
> expensive because a decentralized freemarket based legal system / police
> can
> loose its reputation -> when the current monopoly institution looses its
> reputation, nothing happens, because they have no competition at all).
> So rich people benefit from the current system much more they would do in
> the
> decentralized system.
>
> This happened in my country (Slovakia) where the biggest financial
> corporations
> (J&T and Penta) gained their power just thanks to the corrupted Slovak
> government (in the freemarket decentralized society this won't be possible
> at
> the same price).
>
> If you really care about the centralization of power, you should prefer
> the decentralized anarchist/libertarian systems instead of authoritative
> systems like democracy with a monopoly to coercion.
>
> > I'm now happily a resident of France and while I believe in individual
> > freedom, I believe strongly that centralization of *power* in all it's
> forms
> > must be prevented. For example: I don't think it's acceptable for one or
> a
>
> This is definitely not a case of France :-)
>
> Pavol
> --
> _______________________________________________________________
> [wilder@???] [http://trip.sk/wilder/] [talker: ttt.sk 5678]
>


--
Venlig hilsen.
Glenn Toft
PR konsulent & sælger
Cloudtech Denmark
Faaborgvej 10b
9220 Aalborg Ø
22778173
kontakt@??? / glenn@???