Try using WiFi continuously on your android phone. It'll burn through the
battery in a couple of hours under heavy load. WiFi on phones is inherently
short range too.
On 16 Feb 2014 13:48, "Jacob" <jacobusbogers@???> wrote:

> Keeping the card in your pocket is not really exposing it to the sun
> either,
> Why dont they try an adriod app using the wifi/bluetooth capabilities of
> an adriod smartphone instead of making hardware from scratch?
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Robert Williamson <bobalot@???>wrote:
>
>> What they're describing isn't really currently possible, from an
>> engineering standpoint, the power requirements for continuous wireless and
>> occasional solar recharging won't fit into that form factor.
>> On 16 Feb 2014 13:37, "Jacob" <jacobusbogers@???> wrote:
>>
>>> I checked progress on the bitcoincard, but its kindof silent
>>> http://bitcoincard.org/blog/
>>>
>>> No updates, why, whats going on?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:34 PM, Jacob <jacobusbogers@???> wrote:
>>>
>>>> USA is the biggest economy, so not neglecting it,..,FCC forbids any
>>>> encryption on "packet radio" this extends to the application layer. I
>>>> don't see how oversees transmissions are possible with ISM . without long
>>>> wavelength transmissions. Continents are divided by oceans, there are no
>>>> ocean faring cities yet.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Drak <drak@???> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Maybe in the USA, but the USA is not the rest of the world, and in any
>>>>> case this simply talks about encryption of the transmission. Ad hoc
>>>>> networks are allowed in the USA, there is whitespace to place with for
>>>>> short distances and the ruling only seems to apply to the transport layer.
>>>>> You cant apply that to protocols that might setup outside of the transport,
>>>>> above layers 2 and 3. The ruling also only applied to HAM frequencies, and
>>>>> we are not talking about HAM radio, but about using whitespace for adhoc
>>>>> networks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Drak
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 16 February 2014 13:14, Jacob <jacobusbogers@???> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Actually not, there are open frequencies"
>>>>>> No Link provided?
>>>>>> The FCC ruling is quite clear, no encryption on the transmission of
>>>>>> radio packets.
>>>>>> http://www.arrl.org/news/fcc-dismisses-encryption-petition
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Drak <drak@???> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually not, there are open frequencies. YMMV and there is also
>>>>>>> this coming along: http://bitcoincard.org/ from the Mycelium guys,
>>>>>>> watch the video, it's pretty impressive.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 16 February 2014 12:30, Jacob <jacobusbogers@???> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Never seen it before, but just to be clear, transmissions of
>>>>>>>> encrypted data over HAM radio frequencies is a violation of FCC rules and
>>>>>>>> brings criminal prosecution....
>>>>>>>> So it seem we will be needing our own satalites,..., anyone has a
>>>>>>>> phone nr of Elen Musk?)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Drak <drak@???> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have you see this? http://www.openlibernet.org/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 16 February 2014 12:18, dávid <chaser@???> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It's time to set up wireless mesh networks.
>>>>>>>>>> How long till Bitcoin packet filtering kicks in? Is it possible
>>>>>>>>>> to identify and block those packets on an ISP-level? Or to block node
>>>>>>>>>> discovery? Afaik, it's not end-to-end encrypted (or encrypted at all).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/16/2014 12:33, Amir Taaki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140211/19014226192/
>>>>>>>>>>> uk-govt-goes-extraterritorial-to-clean-up-web-ministers-
>>>>>>>>>>> looking-to-block-extremist-videos-foreign-websites.shtml
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> this makes me sad how predictable this all is. it's really
>>>>>>>>>>> happening.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>