I'm not a tough guy but once I think about the survival of a mesh network, two things come to my mind:
a) authority coming to seize broadcasting nodes
b) authority jamming the frequencies (but that would also hurt their infrastructure)
Don't think that it's a big deal for the greatest military-industrial complex in the world to take out several satellites, either explosive of frequency-based ways. And just because there are no restrictions on it, don't think they won't do it. Please be trustless towards them, they will do what they can.
http://bitcoincard.org/ <
http://bitcoincard.org/>- This is great stuff, given it can be customized in its behavior. Implemented in the wrong way, this can be even dangerous. Privacy must be a number one concern (watch the video and you will know what I mean).
On 2/16/2014 13:48, Jacob wrote:
> defend? I dont see you physicly defending your nodes with guns tuff guy, please wake up. low orbit satellites they have to take out with some very very expensive tech. and there is no restrictions towards communications in space, nation states have staked low earth orbits (yet).
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:46 PM, dávid <chaser@??? <mailto:chaser@riseup.net>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Drak, have seen some mesh ideas before, this one seems good. Their white paper seems to be elaborate.
> Jacob... I'm pretty sure they have their own regulations for satellites too. I think we have more chance on the ground, they can do whatever they want in space, we can't defend a node if we can't physically defend it. And if FCC doesn't like it... then it's their problem, come and take it if they can. Making rules is one thing, enforcing them is another.
>
> On 2/16/2014 13:30, Jacob wrote:
>> Never seen it before, but just to be clear, transmissions of encrypted data over HAM radio frequencies is a violation of FCC rules and brings criminal prosecution....
>> So it seem we will be needing our own satalites,..., anyone has a phone nr of Elen Musk?)
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Drak <drak@??? <mailto:drak@zikula.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Have you see this? http://www.openlibernet.org/
>>
>>
>> On 16 February 2014 12:18, dávid <chaser@??? <mailto:chaser@riseup.net>> wrote:
>>
>> It's time to set up wireless mesh networks.
>> How long till Bitcoin packet filtering kicks in? Is it possible to identify and block those packets on an ISP-level? Or to block node discovery? Afaik, it's not end-to-end encrypted (or encrypted at all).
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/16/2014 12:33, Amir Taaki wrote:
>>
>> http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140211/19014226192/uk-govt-goes-extraterritorial-to-clean-up-web-ministers-looking-to-block-extremist-videos-foreign-websites.shtml
>>
>> this makes me sad how predictable this all is. it's really happening.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list:http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
::
Re: [unSYSTEM] With Porn Filters Go…
