if you think booth babes are something to be attracted to its because
you're a kissless virgin that has been conditioned to only value physical
looks in a woman, when a woman chooses to participate in that, she's also
acknowledging that she is untalented in any other way. of course you can
say "oh but how do you know shes not smart" but i mean come on, they aren't
hiring bitcoin scientists to be booth babes, and by smart i mean educated,
self educated, passionate about something....


On 30 January 2014 06:46, Thomas Hartman <thomas@???> wrote:

> I think also ridicule works better than outrage.
>
> It is also a lot meaner though.
>
> Powerful weapons should be used wisely.
>
> Once wielded, they don't go back in the sheath on the battle field.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:26 PM, Aimee Maree <aimee@???> wrote:
> > I can introduce you to one? I can also introduce you to non blind ones
> and
> > ones who are kernel contributors
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On 30 Jan 2014, at 3:48 pm, Jonathan James Harrison
> > <jonathanjamesharrison@???> wrote:
> >
> > What on earth are you talking about? Blind hermaphrodites???!!!
> >
> > Not sure they would make the best booth babes tbh
> >
> > On Thursday, 30 January 2014, Aimee Maree <aimee@???> wrote:
> >>
> >> not everyone has eyes in their head some use their ears as their eyes
> do
> >> not work... Some are born with no gender or both genders... It is the
> most
> >> limiting concept in society... that's a red pill we should all
> >> acknowledge humans made gender to nature there is no separation...
> >>
> >> anyways and anywho ;)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 30 Jan 2014, at 3:23 pm, Cody R Wilson <codywilson@???>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Just stopped by for team red pill. There is more wisdom in your body
> than
> >> in your deepest philosophy.
> >>
> >> The sexual market has laws we acknowledge with our eyes and minds
> despite
> >> our most furious protests otherwise.
> >>
> >> On Jan 29, 2014 10:08 PM, "Elizabeth Ploshay"
> >> <elizabeth@???> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Patrick, great point there. Agreed!
> >>>
> >>> Elizabeth T. Ploshay
> >>> elizabeth@???
> >>> Manager of Communications
> >>> Bitcoin Magazine
> >>> elizabethtploshay.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Robert Jakob <rsjakob@???>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I just think that was the point he was trying to make.
> >>>>
> >>>> -Robert
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:45 PM, Patrick Murck
> >>>> <patrick@???> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This is just my personal take on the "booth babe" thing. If you want
> to
> >>>>> trot out booth babes all you have accomplished is signaling to me
> that:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1) You don't believe in your product/service/value proposition
> >>>>> 2) You have poor taste and judgment
> >>>>> 3) And I won't be stopping by your booth for a sales pitch
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But hey, knock yourself out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --PM
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On January 29, 2014 at 10:42:12 PM, Jonathan James Harrison
> >>>>> (jonathanjamesharrison@???) wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> What about toilet cleaners at exhibitions they are objectified as
> >>>>> sanitation machines.
> >>>>> Booth babes know they are being objectified and get paid well to be
> >>>>> objectified.
> >>>>> Many men like to look at sexually attractive women which is very
> >>>>> natural.
> >>>>> Booth babes can be great for promotions.
> >>>>> Nice thing about bitcoin is you can set up a company anonymously and
> if
> >>>>> you do that as women you know that there will be absolutely no
> >>>>> discrimination against you.
> >>>>> Satoshi maybe a black Serbian lesbian for all we know.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thursday, 30 January 2014, Aimee Maree <aimee@???>
> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When performing surveys it is one of the number 1 reasons women don't
> >>>>> attend tech conferences... So diversity is affected
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So booth babes are not about allowing women to be women it's about
> >>>>> objectification which is wrong for men women and children oh and by
> the way
> >>>>> those who are born with multi genders or a-sexual and animals etc we
> need to
> >>>>> allow people to be themselves but we also need to allow minorities
> to feel
> >>>>> comfortable if we are ever to change the rule of White Anglo men...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So if you want sex you go to a sex shop that's all cool I'm fine with
> >>>>> that I would like to see unions set up for prostitues personally
> however if
> >>>>> I attend a tech conference I'm there for other reasons just like
> when I go
> >>>>> to an underground party or when I attend a trans gender meet-up etc
> etc see
> >>>>> my point here is horses for courses in regards to the booth babes
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyway these are just some points no way are they saying change your
> >>>>> mind but just hey this is what the people who attend your
> conferences say
> >>>>> and I personally would never attend a conference with a booth babe I
> have
> >>>>> had enough problems being a technical women in IT let alone to be in
> a room
> >>>>> where my gender is subjectified. So you can have your booth babes
> but a high
> >>>>> number of women won't be at your conferences and you will sending a
> message
> >>>>> to young girls sorry in IT your still seen as a joke!
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Anyways just some thoughts?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 30 Jan 2014, at 1:38 pm, Robert Jakob <rsjakob@???> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That being said, there is a point to be made. I think "booth babes"
> >>>>> are rather harmless. That kind of superficial lust can snowball
> into worse
> >>>>> things like prostitution, sexual slaver, child marriages, etc...
> It's like
> >>>>> the symptom of a deeper sickness. However, when you start down that
> path of
> >>>>> dictating how a person should live, or act, or dress, or what kind of
> >>>>> personality they should have, it becomes a slippery slope. It
> becomes a new
> >>>>> disease. The whole reason we are all anti-establishment in the
> first place.
> >>>>> If you infringe on another's right to be free and express themselves
> in any
> >>>>> way that makes them happy, you become the oppressor.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So I do agree with both sides of the argument. I abhor the
> >>>>> objectification of human beings, and the superficial, and the
> materialistic,
> >>>>> but I also believe free-will is the most fundamental human right.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Anthony D'Onofrio
> >>>>> <iamtexture@???> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --------------------
> >>>>> Patrick Murck
> >>>>> General Counsel
> >>>>>
> >>>>> <pt_2060_1947_o.jpg>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> patrick@???
> >>>>> 703.608.8864
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @virtuallylaw
> >>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/patrickmurck
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This message is intended to be confidential and may be legally
> >>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you are
> not the
> >>>>> intended recipient, please delete this message from your system and
> notify
> >>>>> me immediately. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or action
> taken or
> >>>>> omitted to be taken by an unintended recipient in reliance on this
> message
> >>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>