>>>>>>    Rough day?
>>>>>>    He got a double full page spread in London's biggest evening
>>>>>>    paper, which credited him amongst other things, as a genius.

>>>>>>    https://twitter.com/wollit/status/428575608709578753

>>>>>>    On 29 Jan 2014, at 21:24, Anthony D'Onofrio <iamtexture@???
>>>>>>    <mailto:iamtexture@gmail.com>> wrote:

>>>>>>>    You lost me at the dumb whores part.
>>>>>>>    Value does not stem from living up to any culturally-mandated
>>>>>>>    expectations.
>>>>>>>    Not culture at large and not yours or mine. Women should be able
>>>>>>>    to dress
>>>>>>>    however they like and still demand respect and love. That
>>>>>>>    includes American,
>>>>>>>    Muslim, Asian, slutty, skimpy, nude, sexy, frumpy - whatever.
>>>>>>>    These women
>>>>>>>    are no less women because of the clothing they put on. They're
>>>>>>>    just like
>>>>>>>    everyone else - tiny people on a big world in an even larger
>>>>>>>    universe,
>>>>>>>    unsure of who they are and what they are, responding to the
>>>>>>>    environment
>>>>>>>    they found themselves in, the mental state they were born into,
>>>>>>>    and the
>>>>>>>    mental state of those around them.

>>>>>>>    Men respond to beautiful women. Even women respond to beautiful
>>>>>>>    women.
>>>>>>>    A very simple marketing tool is getting beautiful women to stand
>>>>>>>    next to a
>>>>>>>    product. Or hand out a product. Or use a product. This is not
>>>>>>>    exploitative of
>>>>>>>    the beautiful women or reflective of their value. It is
>>>>>>>    reflective of us as a whole,
>>>>>>>    human animals - who are driven by impulses that are not
>>>>>>>    culturally mandated,
>>>>>>>    but which extend from our being as animals who require
>>>>>>>    procreation and
>>>>>>>    survival. This is exploitative of the men who are tricked into
>>>>>>>    associating this
>>>>>>>    product with beautiful women.

>>>>>>>    Sounds like you're having a rough day Amir. I hope it gets better.

>>>>>>>    On Jan 29, 2014, at 1:15 PM, Amir Taaki wrote:

>>>>>>>>    http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1wg481/hot_asian_chicks_giving_out_free_bitcoins_in_hong/

>>>>>>>>    This is trash and degrading to women. People have endless
>>>>>>>>    discussions
>>>>>>>>    about girls in Bitcoin and then talk like this.

>>>>>>>>    And why? Because it's about promoting girls who find their value
>>>>>>>>    through
>>>>>>>>    their sexuality + beauty, rather than what they objectively do
>>>>>>>>    as people.

>>>>>>>>    Most of you who don't understand are kissless virgins who will go
>>>>>>>>    through their life trying to buy the affection of women. Sex is
>>>>>>>>    good,
>>>>>>>>    love is great... but this attitude of trying to push bitcoin through
>>>>>>>>    sexy women with no brains vs pushing the smart women in our
>>>>>>>>    community is
>>>>>>>>    trash.

>>>>>>>>    For all the Bitcoiners who seek legitimacy/image and complain
>>>>>>>>    about me
>>>>>>>>    pushing drugs, where are the people saying this is wrong. This
>>>>>>>>    is one of
>>>>>>>>    the highest voted stories on the front page. What did these
>>>>>>>>    girls do to
>>>>>>>>    get that attention of all the Bitcoiners? And what about
>>>>>>>>    Elizabeth who
>>>>>>>>    works tirelessly on Bitcoin.

>>>>>>>>    We have smart capable women in our community, so why are we
>>>>>>>>    promoting
>>>>>>>>    these dumb whores? Who the fuck are they? Plastic girls with big
>>>>>>>>    tits?
>>>>>>>>    Wow you're so cool. It reminds me of when the BF choose that young
>>>>>>>>    plastic pretty spokesgirl to represent them on TV who knew
>>>>>>>>    nothing about
>>>>>>>>    bitcoin. And those BitPay adverts who use the girl in pretty red
>>>>>>>>    lipstick to push their product. Why not promote a world based on
>>>>>>>>    love
>>>>>>>>    with relationships established based on mutual understanding, rather
>>>>>>>>    than promoting a world where men make money to fuck good looking
>>>>>>>>    young
>>>>>>>>    bitches. 90% of you will never be in that bracket either.

>>>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>    unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
>>>>>>>>    https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>    unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
>>>>>>>    https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>>>>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>>>>    unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
>>>>>>    https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem