So sad that you're fed up with me.

This seems great for fairly anonymous payments.

My only problem is if the deterministic offset n is encoded in the paying
transaction then anyone else you also gave that mpk to, will also see the
address.

So I still really prefer some solution where payment addresses are
contracted and signed by a key, for either a one off payment or a sequence
of payments over a period.

Thanks
Bob
On 14 Jan 2014 00:31, "Nicolás Mendoza" <nicolasmendo@???> wrote:

> Thanks for using Drak in your example, I'm fed up with Bob and Alice
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote:
>
>> great, thanks for showing me this. I know the basic idea. The only thing
>> I'd add is that once you know the nonce, that the payor doesn't need to
>> recreate these txs repeatedly. So when I pay Drak, I only need to do
>> this the first ever time I pay Drak.
>>
>> On 13/01/14 19:49, Drak wrote:
>> > Have you guys seen this discussion on the bitcoin mailing list (and now
>> > there is a working
>> > implementation):
>> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=31813471
>> >
>> > Seems to be a major step forward in terms of privacy. Probably needs a
>> > few more technical eyes on it but it looks really promising.
>> >
>> > Drak
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Nicolas Mendoza
>
> PhD Researcher
> School of Creative Media
> City University of Hong Kong
> China PDR - HKSAR
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>