Pi
El 01/01/2014 21:47, "Amir Taaki" <genjix@???> escribió:
> This is our proposal:
> https://wiki.unsystem.net/index.php/DarkWallet/Overview
>
> These are our priorities:
> https://wiki.unsystem.net/index.php/DarkWallet#Priorities
>
> We're under-resourced, and making a multi-currency wallet that
> integrates new protocol layers is not serving the people who crowd
> funded us. There are several protocol layer projects now all competing:
> Colored Coins, MasterCoin, BitShares, Freimarket, Ethereum and others. I
> don't think it's wise to spend our time committing to VHS or Betamax
> when it's not clear what happens and *none* of these technologies are
> production ready. We have to complete the privacy and blockchain
> scalability tools and this is not easy work. It's extremely difficult
> and more and more questions keep opening up.
>
> Have you seen Ethereum?
>
> http://ethereum.org/ethereum.html
>
> The project is active and very interesting. They need resources, and
> would be great if you could work together.
>
> My main gripe with BitShares is that it adds the missing features to
> Bitcoin as extensions rather than looking what can be enabled in Bitcoin
> to make these features a possibility (which is what the Freimarket guys
> did). Ethereum is much more interesting than the other protocol layers
> because it's creating a generic computing platform with a consensus on
> the results. You can do all of MC, BS, FM, ... whatever protocol layer
> and much much more with Ethereum.
>
> vitalik is the author.
>
> On 01/01/14 21:14, Daniel Larimer wrote:
> > From the perspective of the wallet, it would be multi-currency and focus
> > almost entirely on browser side management of keys. The browser would
> > simply fetch the latest transactions, scan them, update balances, and
> > enabling the building of transactions. The time and effort involved on
> > the wallet side would actually be very minimal once you have the
> > infrastructure for a Bitcoin wallet.
> >
> > We are building a separate block explorer that will display a live feed
> > of market conditions so the wallet wouldn't have to focus on building
> > the charts.
> >
> > Bottom line, I don't think that it would require much risk to Dark
> > Wallet's current design. There are about 8 'output types' that would
> > need to be managed, every transfer has a unit, and otherwise very
> > similar logic to a bitcoin wallet.
> >
> > I haven't looked at the web-based wallets, but CryptoKit seems to be the
> > biggest competitor to DarkWallet.
> >
> > Anyone who has doubts about BitShares should schedule a Skype call with
> > me. The white paper needs to be refreshed to add clearer explanations.
> >
> > You all have a lot of talent and I would like to maximize the benefit we
> > can give society by working together.
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Jan 1, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Thomas Hartman <thomashartman1@???
> > <mailto:thomashartman1@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> I confess I don't follow how bitshares will work although I read the
> >> whitepaper. In other words I have some doubts.
> >>
> >> But I'll give BitShares the benefit of the doubt for the purposes of
> >> this response and instead ask: what sort of architecture would be most
> >> cobducive to what you propose?
> >>
> >> In other words, what should the components be, and where should the
> >> interfaces be, to promote maximal opportunities for collaboration
> >> while minimizing risk that one or both projects could fail?
> >>
> >> Personally I'm taking a close look at sx tool with a view to
> >> refactoring it and plugging it into other codedbases I'm working on. I
> >> haven't taken a close look at darkwallet yet but I'm curious what you
> >> think with fresh beginner mind hat on.
> >>
> >> On Jan 1, 2014 11:58 AM, "Daniel Larimer"
> >> <dlarimer@???
> >> <mailto:dlarimer@invictus-innovations.com>> wrote:
> >>
> >> All,
> >> I would like to make a proposal that we combine your work on
> >> the Dark Wallet with my work on BitShares. The result would be a
> >> browser-based client that enables everyone to buy/sell/short and
> >> deal in options all manner of currencies.
> >>
> >> I am prepared to fund such an effort if we can agree on some
> >> basic specs and costs.
> >>
> >> I think we would all make a lot more progress by working
> >> together if possible.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> >> Dan
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
::
Re: [unSYSTEM] DarkWallet for BitSh…
