Ethereum sounds super interesting! Hope we see soon more of it and hope he can find enough resources.
Am 01.01.2014 um 22:47 schrieb Amir Taaki <genjix@???>:
> This is our proposal:
> https://wiki.unsystem.net/index.php/DarkWallet/Overview
>
> These are our priorities:
> https://wiki.unsystem.net/index.php/DarkWallet#Priorities
>
> We're under-resourced, and making a multi-currency wallet that
> integrates new protocol layers is not serving the people who crowd
> funded us. There are several protocol layer projects now all competing:
> Colored Coins, MasterCoin, BitShares, Freimarket, Ethereum and others. I
> don't think it's wise to spend our time committing to VHS or Betamax
> when it's not clear what happens and *none* of these technologies are
> production ready. We have to complete the privacy and blockchain
> scalability tools and this is not easy work. It's extremely difficult
> and more and more questions keep opening up.
>
> Have you seen Ethereum?
>
> http://ethereum.org/ethereum.html
>
> The project is active and very interesting. They need resources, and
> would be great if you could work together.
>
> My main gripe with BitShares is that it adds the missing features to
> Bitcoin as extensions rather than looking what can be enabled in Bitcoin
> to make these features a possibility (which is what the Freimarket guys
> did). Ethereum is much more interesting than the other protocol layers
> because it's creating a generic computing platform with a consensus on
> the results. You can do all of MC, BS, FM, ... whatever protocol layer
> and much much more with Ethereum.
>
> vitalik is the author.
>
> On 01/01/14 21:14, Daniel Larimer wrote:
>> From the perspective of the wallet, it would be multi-currency and focus
>> almost entirely on browser side management of keys. The browser would
>> simply fetch the latest transactions, scan them, update balances, and
>> enabling the building of transactions. The time and effort involved on
>> the wallet side would actually be very minimal once you have the
>> infrastructure for a Bitcoin wallet.
>>
>> We are building a separate block explorer that will display a live feed
>> of market conditions so the wallet wouldn't have to focus on building
>> the charts.
>>
>> Bottom line, I don't think that it would require much risk to Dark
>> Wallet's current design. There are about 8 'output types' that would
>> need to be managed, every transfer has a unit, and otherwise very
>> similar logic to a bitcoin wallet.
>>
>> I haven't looked at the web-based wallets, but CryptoKit seems to be the
>> biggest competitor to DarkWallet.
>>
>> Anyone who has doubts about BitShares should schedule a Skype call with
>> me. The white paper needs to be refreshed to add clearer explanations.
>>
>> You all have a lot of talent and I would like to maximize the benefit we
>> can give society by working together.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 1, 2014, at 3:47 PM, Thomas Hartman <thomashartman1@???
>> <mailto:thomashartman1@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> I confess I don't follow how bitshares will work although I read the
>>> whitepaper. In other words I have some doubts.
>>>
>>> But I'll give BitShares the benefit of the doubt for the purposes of
>>> this response and instead ask: what sort of architecture would be most
>>> cobducive to what you propose?
>>>
>>> In other words, what should the components be, and where should the
>>> interfaces be, to promote maximal opportunities for collaboration
>>> while minimizing risk that one or both projects could fail?
>>>
>>> Personally I'm taking a close look at sx tool with a view to
>>> refactoring it and plugging it into other codedbases I'm working on. I
>>> haven't taken a close look at darkwallet yet but I'm curious what you
>>> think with fresh beginner mind hat on.
>>>
>>> On Jan 1, 2014 11:58 AM, "Daniel Larimer"
>>> <dlarimer@???
>>> <mailto:dlarimer@invictus-innovations.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> All,
>>> I would like to make a proposal that we combine your work on
>>> the Dark Wallet with my work on BitShares. The result would be a
>>> browser-based client that enables everyone to buy/sell/short and
>>> deal in options all manner of currencies.
>>>
>>> I am prepared to fund such an effort if we can agree on some
>>> basic specs and costs.
>>>
>>> I think we would all make a lot more progress by working
>>> together if possible.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Dan
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
::
Re: [unSYSTEM] DarkWallet for BitSh…
