No strong feelings on any of these. Feel free to use your judgement.

We can also add more commands for convenience which are bash or Python
scripts.

"I find sx currently most valuable as a teaching/learning tool for how
signing and script works at a low level, that is easier to use than
bitcoind; and possibly as a proof-of-concept for other more useful tools
that will ultimately be built on top of libbitcoin. (like darkwallet)"

-> Exactly. I originally hoped for SX as a way to get more people
familiar with the internal parts of Bitcoin.

On 30/12/13 17:39, Noel Maersk wrote:
> tphyahoo has been working on sx help files, command naming, and some
> argument passing.
>
> 1. sx help files
>
> For easier folowing, I've separated this into a single branch:
>
> https://github.com/veox/sx/commits/docfix
>
> 3 commits, not sure about
>
> https://github.com/veox/sx/commit/27c980b665d5be3d288860cbecb2eb929d767755
>
> Should be safe to merge. I'll go ahead if no one objects.
>
>
> 2,3. command naming and passing arguments
>
> This certainly warrants a little discussion.
>
> https://github.com/spesmilo/sx/issues/21
> sx set-input should take a transaction on stdin and emit a transaction
> on stdout
>
> https://github.com/spesmilo/sx/issues/19
> Have consistent naming for BLOCKCHAIN UPDATES sx commands
>
> This would change the command syntax and break some folks' workflow.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libbitcoin mailing list
> Libbitcoin@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin
>