There is a nascent subreddit I recently found that is centered on trying to
use blockchain technology to enable polycentric legal systems (wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycentric_law).
It's not technical in content, but very interesting nonetheless, and the
motive is definitely about using bitcoin tech for change, not as a get rich
quick scheme.
Check it out:
http://www.reddit.com/r/bitlaw/
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 11:37 PM, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote:
> wise words. we must cater with better features and make useful tools,
> fill the niches uncatered for. and use our imagination to forge ahead
> and thrive :)
>
> On 27/12/13 23:30, Manfred Karrer wrote:
> > quality does not scale well / small is beuatiful
> >
> > Yes its kind of frustrating to see where the masses are…
> > But at the end it just a signal to adopt ones personal noise filter.
> Reddit has too much gossip and social media marketing grind (where is
> mastercoins marketing budget spent?).
> > And Bitcointalk is also getting worse over time. Too many people - too
> less quality.
> > Seems that there is some logic that the stuff where the masses are, are
> getting more superficial.
> > Avantgarde and masses are contradictions. I dont mean that arrogant or
> elitarian. People who have strong desire to think further are putting
> themself away from the center and the present. Even if the center would
> follow up quickly then you would even go further. There is a drive to be
> ahead…
> >
> > I am very sceptical that revolutionary ideas like btc will be adopted by
> the masses that way like they are intended. They will adopt it not because
> of the noble features but because of convenience and comfort.
> > And thats why I think one of the biggest dangers for btc could be a
> similar project, more convenient, easier to use, but in its foundations a
> traitor.
> > Ripple looks to me somehow like that (faster but not decentralized).
> > Mobile networks in relation to Internet is like that. People do not
> appreciate the decentralized concept of the Internet, they exchange it on
> the fly with a totally centralized, controlled network like mobile if its
> more convenient.
> >
> > But I am not frustrated with that. Stuff that really matters will
> survive by itself. It will be stronger. Like open source is stronger the
> long run and like independent developers like you guys are stonger then
> some devs in some million dollar funded silicon valley startups.
> >
> > I think that mailing list will be that what you asked for. Maybe small
> but beautiful!
> >
> >
> > Am 26.12.2013 um 06:58 schrieb Amir Taaki <genjix@???>:
> >
> >>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1to07m/interview_with_mihai_alisie_of_bitcoin_magazine/
> >>
> >> mihai's interview full of passion, enthusiasm and foresight. talking
> about
> >> new tech being made and unveiling his new opensource project for the
> >> community.
> >>
> >>
> http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1tplw1/cruising_through_beverly_hills_when_suddenly/
> >>
> >> picture of nice car owned by the paypal of bitcoin. front page.
> >>
> >> the revolution is still a long way away. people still get excited by
> sleek
> >> cars and luxurious displays of excessive wealth.
> >>
> >> bitcoin reddit: excitement about price, television, governments, new
> >> merchants. maybe this doesn't represent the core of bitcoin, but where
> are
> >> the places to interact with the core of this community motivated by
> >> constructive change? it's certainly not the forums either.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>