Adam when you say "ignore it and do something else," what do you suggest?

I am not saying there is not an alternative, I am asking for alternatives.

Do you suggest, for example, some sort of copyleft-ish proposal that would
protect only sections of proposed ideas on github, rather than a whole
repo?

Should the crypto anarchist manifesto be used in place of license text(s)?

Should there be no license text?

Do you think GPL would be ok if it were changed in a certain way?

What do you suggest? I am certainly curious.


> On 12/17/2013 10:22 PM, Aimee Maree wrote:
>> Actually there is a course of action you can take I will state something
>> here
>>
>> Linux the most successfully open source project in the world is GPL for
>> a reason
>>
>> Sent from somewhere...
>>
>
> I'm not sure that success represents an argument. Goldman Sachs is
> highly successful.
>
> If you don't believe that the current legal system around intellectual
> property is moral (I don't) then the best solution is not to hack the
> system. The best solution is to ignore it and do something else. If on
> the other hand you do not see a practical way of ignoring an immoral
> system and feel the need to take part, then hack away - just don't kid
> yourself.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>