/* vim: set expandtab ts=4 sw=4: */
/*
* You may redistribute this program and/or modify it under the terms of
* the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Software Foundation,
* either version 3 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/

Easy for you to say

On 12/13/2013 03:13 PM, jindq1 wrote:
> It's not using it "against itself", it's supporting the very tenants that brought it about in the first place and thus securing it's existence. The only way copyright monopolies will stop is when people are no longer selfish with what they make. I would have thought people in this group, being pro-world-change, would be selfless.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Peter Todd <pete@??? <mailto:pete@petertodd.org>> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Stallman got this one right. Use copyright against itself as long as it exists; don't put yourself in a position of weakness first.
>
> Amir Taaki <genjix@??? <mailto:genjix@riseup.net>> wrote:
>> Why the GPL?
>
>> http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2013/10/googles-iron-grip-on-android-controlling-open-source-by-any-means-necessary/ Google’s iron grip on Android: Controlling open source by any means necessary
>
>> http://hintjens.com/blog:68 How To Capture an Open Source Project
>
>> Until copyright stops existing, I have no reason to give my work free to corporations and people writing proprietary software. Exploiting the law to protect yourself is a valid form of resistance.
>
>> On 12/12/13 16:42, Mike Gogulski wrote:
>>> More GPL crap, Amir? C'mon. One of these days you've got to realize
>> that
>>> threatening to sic the police on people with bogus, unsupportable IP
>> law
>>> as justification is not only unfriendly, but bad for the adoption of otherwise good code. Stallman be damned.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 12/12/2013 05:39 PM, Amir Taaki wrote:
>>>> I've created a new library which will have non-critical code (like deterministic wallets, key formats and selecting outputs) ported
>> from
>>>> libbitcoin to libwallet.
>>>>
>>>> This will keep libbitcoin focused on its core functionality. The
>> client
>>>> side stuff is less important considering all the wallet development
>> done
>>>> in Python, JavaScript .etc libbitcoin is aimed at server software.
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/spesmilo/libwallet
>>>>
>>>> The install-sx.sh has been updated to reflect this. Users simply
>> need to
>>>> re-run the script to update.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>>
>
>
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>