aha ok. I would just use the normal main net. I've got mine built for
mainnet which is why it interprets your addresses as normal bitcoin
addresses.

I'll look into that message. have you tried your code with a tiny amount
of BTC? don't forget to put a fee too.

On 09/12/13 00:34, Chang Lan wrote:
> The “address” in both input and the second output
> is mnRQG7kRAapsriWL8hKHRWpw6AgSyWWmn4 in my machine. I have no idea why
> we saw difference. I built the libbitcoin with ‘—enable-testnet’.
>
> I tried to make the transaction using ‘mktx’. Here is we I got:
>
> $ sx mktx txfile.tx --input
> cb502ebca60cfe43bf0cd1c91a50ab07590eb8d35c3b2d29306693dfa36047d0:0
> --output mnRQG7kRAapsriWL8hKHRWpw6AgSyWWmn4:309999990
>
> Added input
> cb502ebca60cfe43bf0cd1c91a50ab07590eb8d35c3b2d29306693dfa36047d0:0
> mktx: Unsupported address type.
>
> mnRQG7kRAapsriWL8hKHRWpw6AgSyWWmn4 is the address I have:
> https://blockexplorer.com/testnet/address/mnRQG7kRAapsriWL8hKHRWpw6AgSyWWmn4
>
> Best,
> Chang
>
> On Sunday, December 8, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Amir Taaki wrote:
>
>> Are you able to construct the tx using the command line tools sx?
>>
>> Then you can port the code as you use it piece by piece into your own
>> application.
>>
>> You need to update sx from the git repository (that should be fixed).
>> Here's what I see:
>>
>> hash: 43919afd984bf86a421bc5d32ddc25bbaad996d6429a0e6a81b6d6059aa86db2
>> version: 1
>> locktime: 0
>> Input:
>> previous output:
>> cb502ebca60cfe43bf0cd1c91a50ab07590eb8d35c3b2d29306693dfa36047d0:0
>> script: [
>> 3045022100b4760147383d74cc68c1004755d3e210949370358309d5d64e81f3ec0e54ba470220540d21755a68946f19eaebb1b7b3c5649ee5825ac7363bdededcf445f2912a3001
>> ] [
>> 04a0160a564377fc9af6100827cf0726bf794aa57c6b908731b0cd6057da8a8ae01597c54fdce5b0b58cbd87de98821c71c638724dac5c93c7539d7f3351c20a5f
>> ]
>> sequence: 4294967295
>> address: 17uSy4fSMZPd5c2iR8LubbccEB5jyJi9rc
>> Output:
>> value: 10
>> script: 2 [
>> 04a0160a564377fc9af6100827cf0726bf794aa57c6b908731b0cd6057da8a8ae01597c54fdce5b0b58cbd87de98821c71c638724dac5c93c7539d7f3351c20a5f
>> ] [
>> 04a0160a564377fc9af6100827cf0726bf794aa57c6b908731b0cd6057da8a8ae01597c54fdce5b0b58cbd87de98821c71c638724dac5c93c7539d7f3351c20a5f
>> ] 2 checkmultisig
>> Output:
>> value: 309999990
>> script: dup hash160 [ 4bbc0f7fff6b9135e3bf1a472b464ec127947cfb ]
>> equalverify checksig
>> address: 17uSy4fSMZPd5c2iR8LubbccEB5jyJi9rc
>>
>>
>> On 08/12/13 21:18, Chang Lan wrote:
>>> Thanks Amir!
>>>
>>> I am using testnet so the TXDATA is for testnet:
>>>
>>> 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
>>>
>>> sx showtx worked well but when I used the command
>>>
>>> echo TXDATA | sx validsx
>>>
>>> I got
>>>
>>> terminate called after throwing an instance of
>>> 'libbitcoin::end_of_stream’
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Chang
>>>
>>> On Sunday, December 8, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Amir Taaki wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Your code looks correct. You can use the command:
>>>>
>>>> echo TXDATA | sx validtx
>>>>
>>>> to check the correctness of the tx (but I'm not sure if the reported
>>>> erros are always correct - I need to investigate that).
>>>>
>>>> You can also examine the data using:
>>>>
>>>> echo TXDATA | sx showtx
>>>>
>>>> your sign code is correct, and the other code looks good. If you give me
>>>> the hex I can see if I spot anything.
>>>>
>>>> Here's some code for constructing transactions:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/spesmilo/sx/blob/master/src/wallet.cpp
>>>> (see line 361 to 521)
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/darkwallet/python-obelisk/blob/master/examples/mktx.py
>>>> https://github.com/darkwallet/python-obelisk/blob/master/obelisk/bitcoin.py
>>>> (see line 998)
>>>>
>>>> On 08/12/13 20:50, Chang Lan wrote:
>>>>> Hi there,
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried making a valid transaction using libbitcoin, but it seems that
>>>>> the transaction turns out to be invalid. Below is the code snippet that
>>>>> I used to create a transaction. Can anyone point out if I did it wrong?
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> void add_input(transaction_type& tx, const output_point& output)
>>>>> {
>>>>> transaction_input_type input;
>>>>> output_point& prevout = input.previous_output;
>>>>> prevout = output;
>>>>> input.sequence = 4294967295;
>>>>> tx.inputs.push_back(input);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bool sign(transaction_type& tx, size_t input_index, const
>>>>> elliptic_curve_key& key, const script_type& script_code)
>>>>> {
>>>>> transaction_input_type& input = tx.inputs[input_index];
>>>>> const data_chunk public_key = key.public_key();
>>>>> if (public_key.empty())
>>>>> {
>>>>> std::cerr << "internal error getting public key" << std::endl;
>>>>> return false;
>>>>> }
>>>>> hash_digest tx_hash = script_type::generate_signature_hash(tx,
>>>>> input_index, script_code, 1);
>>>>> if (tx_hash == null_hash)
>>>>> {
>>>>> std::cerr << "error generating signature hash" << std::endl;
>>>>> return false;
>>>>> }
>>>>> data_chunk signature = key.sign(tx_hash);
>>>>> signature.push_back(0x01);
>>>>>
>>>>> script_type input_script;
>>>>> input_script.push_operation({opcode::special, signature});
>>>>> std::cout << key.public_key().size() << std::endl;
>>>>> input_script.push_operation({opcode::special, key.public_key()});
>>>>> tx.inputs[input_index].script = input_script;
>>>>>
>>>>> return true;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bool create_channel_tx(transaction_type& tx, const data_chunk&
>>>>> payee_public_key, const data_chunk& payer_public_key, uint64_t value)
>>>>> {
>>>>> /* … */
>>>>> */* called add_input() for each input */*
>>>>> // output 1
>>>>> script_type out_script = build_contract_script(acc.key.public_key(),
>>>>> remote_public_key);
>>>>> transaction_output_type output;
>>>>> output.value = value;
>>>>> output.script = out_script;
>>>>> tx.outputs.push_back(output);
>>>>> // output 2
>>>>> payment_address payaddr;
>>>>> set_public_key(payaddr, acc.key.public_key());
>>>>> script_type back_script = build_pubkey_hash_script(payaddr.hash());
>>>>> transaction_output_type back_output;
>>>>> back_output.value = collected_value - value;
>>>>> back_output.script = back_script;
>>>>> tx.outputs.push_back(back_output);
>>>>>
>>>>> // sign each input
>>>>> for (size_t i = 0; i < tx.inputs.size(); ++i)
>>>>> {
>>>>> sign(tx, i, acc.key, back_script);
>>>>> }
>>>>> return true;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Chang
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Libbitcoin mailing list
>>>>> Libbitcoin@??? <mailto:Libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
>>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Libbitcoin mailing list
>>>> Libbitcoin@??? <mailto:Libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org>
>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libbitcoin mailing list
> Libbitcoin@???
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libbitcoin
>