I agree with Mathias. Also looking forward to hearing more about your
project.

Cheers,
Mihai
On 22/11/13 03:22, Mathias Groennebaek wrote:
> Your project sounds very promising, exchanges are the achilles heel of
> bitcoin, and in many cases the people who are most likely to pursue
> regulatory compliance are people who run exchanges.
>
> Localbitcoins is a good project, but it lacks ease of use. Which is key.
>
> Would be interresting to hear more about.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Adam Gibson <ekaggata@???> wrote:
>
>> Myself and dansmith on the BTC talk forum have been developing a system
>> for allowing people to buy BTC via bank accounts,OK Pay and others without
>> the need for trusting a third party, by making a verifiable record of the
>> ssl session, and using 2 of 3 multisig for dispute resolution. The project
>> is described in brief here:
>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=326233.msg3499434#msg3499434
>> and we already have "oracle" machines running for testing.
>>
>> Code is at https://github.com/themighty1/ssllog and other places.
>>
>> Detailed technical descriptions aren't really set up but you can see the
>> (completely rambling) development in
>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=173220.msg3429555#msg3429555.
>>
>> Would people be interested in our coming to Milan to discuss it?
>> I realise (well I think I do) that the meetup/conference is not mostly
>> about this kind of thing, but I just thought there might be some interest.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

--
Editor-in-Chief Bitcoin Magazine