Aha! So retep == Peter Todd. Nice to make that connection. No real
objections to your objections to my objections, either, which is
unsurprising since you're one of the people I've long marked as an ally,
first on the forum and now more recently on the Foundation forum.

On 11/16/2013 01:51 PM, Peter Todd wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 01:15:36PM +0100, Mike Gogulski wrote:
>> This is well-intentioned, but I can't see how it necessarily sums to
>> positive outcomes for all use cases.
>>
>> My objections here:
>> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=334316.msg3600969#msg3600969
> And my objections to your objections here:
>
> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=334316.msg3601224#msg3601224
>
> tl;dr: It's just some discouragement to help a pressing problem, and the
> strategy can and probably will change in the future as the situation
> develops.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem