:: Re: [unSYSTEM] The law of the free
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Daniel Larimer
日付:  
To: System undo crew
題目: Re: [unSYSTEM] The law of the free
The key to freedom is eliminating the need for courts to enforce contracts. Giving the government even this single task already creates courts outside the consent of the governed. From this monopoly over interpreting and enforcing (or not enforcing) contracts all other power of government can be derived.

Courts, Democracies and governments are all evolutions that enhance tyranny by hiding it behind a mask of legitimacy and fairness. None of these systems has worked to enhance freedom or to protect the life, liberty, or property of the people. At the core of monopoly courts is the authority to reallocate property without the consent of the owners. At the core of democracy is that the majority can reallocate resources of the minority. At the core of government is that they own everything and may kill whom they like.

I contend that it is unnecessary to rely on coercion to enforce contracts or maintain law and order. This means that it is possible to operate without the need for government courts and the key to all of this is decentralized identity, reputation, arbitration, and surety bonds. Almost all of this can be implemented with block-chain based consensus with a proper set of rules.

I am working on making this a reality and would love to work with others interested in the same.

Non Violent Law Enforcement: https://the-iland.net/content/nonviolent-law-enforcement
Our Socialist Justice System: https://the-iland.net/content/socialist-justice-system

Dan

On Nov 2, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Benjamin Cordes <benjamin.l.cordes@???> wrote:

> "I prefer to keep Bitcoin pure, simple and focused. Value transfer from A ? B. "
>
> Almost all meaningful economic transactions involve third parties. Governments and courts evolved for precisely this reason. Contracts are enforced by the law (and thereby the power of the state, as Mike pointed out). The question very much remains how Bitcoin improves at all on economic transactions. I think there is a lot of confusion about this, to put it mildly. Much of what is written is not very well intellectually grounded. Courts, democracies, governments evolved over roughly 1000 years.
>
> Mastercoin and BIP70 are good examples of how the Bitcoin community really fails to acknowledge some basic fundamental principles of how economic transactions and contracts work. Which is why we haven't really seen any major new use case, besides those which involve activities which bypass laws (donating to political organizations which Visa & Mastercard don't like). Bitcoin is very far away from changing any of this, especially if does not add any layers which make it useful. However, once such layers would exist the potential is almost unbounded.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 2:38 PM, jamileh s.t. <xiaziyna@???> wrote:
> a single signal,
> far too old to hear
> uncountable and yet more mutable
> than mere breathing and vanishing,
> too minimal for death.
> singular and yet a unity
> a multitude of the single celled
>
>
> On 31 October 2013 11:48, Amir Taaki <genjix@???> wrote:
>
> very busy, hard to keep up with email. both your explanations are
> correct. imagine a poker table. if everyone's collaborating, then the
> game is rigged. same with tor. you need at least 1 hop to be honest
> for it to work. with mixing you need at least 1 other to be honest.
> this is the basis for byzantine fault tolerance working (see the paper
> about NFS).
>
> On 31/10/13 12:45, Tristan Winters wrote:
> > Yeah, I am hoping to do the same thing with our Australian
> > Foundation. We may be far away, but we?ve got a kick-arse team.
> >
> > The more projects like this the better.
> >
> > I am pretty certain that Coin Punk funding is coming straight from
> > the foundation. Bitcoin magazine ran an article about Coin Punk
> > getting a grant from them.
> >
> > Anyway, did you get my email about the trustless mixer ??? I?m in a
> > debate with a guy about it and I?d appreciate your feedback.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > TW.
> >
> > On 31 Oct 2013, at 12:37 pm, Amir Taaki <genjix@???
> > <mailto:genjix@riseup.net>> wrote:
> >
> > his email: Kyle Drake <kyledrake@???
> > <mailto:kyledrake@gmail.com>>
> >
> > I think we can provide people a credible alternative to help good
> > projects we want to see thrive.
> >
> > On 31/10/13 12:34, Tristan Winters wrote:
> >>>> Cool Video.
> >>>>
> >>>> But isn?t the "Coin Punk? wallet financed by the US
> >>>> Foundation?
> >>>>
> >>>> TW.
> >>>>
> >>>> On 31 Oct 2013, at 9:05 am, Cody R Wilson
> >>>> <codywilson@??? <mailto:codywilson@utexas.edu>
> >>>> <mailto:codywilson@utexas.edu>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Trick or Treat, Western Civilization:
> >>>>> http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/bitcoin-dark-wallet/x/5141070
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> Render your contempt visible, your resistance invisible.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /While hitherto all valuations and ideals have been built
> >>>>> on ignorance of Bitcoin or in contradiction to it-
> >>>>> therefore long live Bitcoin!/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:17 AM, jindq1 <jindq1@???
> >>>>> <mailto:jindq1@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Email is inefficient for much more than general updates.
> >>>>> That's the gist of it.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Amir Taaki
> >>>>> <genjix@??? <mailto:genjix@riseup.net>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>> but we are all here now with a collective voice, creating
> >>>> projects, making a name and creative a voice for everyone.
> >>>> what is openbitco.in <http://openbitco.in/> offering better?
> >>>>
> >>>> On 31/10/13 04:50, jindq1 wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> While I may not always feel like the people on this list
> >>>> match my
> >>>>> own personal opinions on economics, politics and
> >>>>> technology, I'm here because I crave difference (it's how
> >>>>> you learn about
> >>>> yourself
> >>>>> and the world afterall). That's why even if I hear a
> >>>>> million
> >>>> things
> >>>>> I don't agree with, I won't ignore it, I'll either argue
> >>>> with it or
> >>>>> accept it. This has prompted me to take my own interests
> >>>>> in learning, being productive and useful, and my disgust
> >>>>> for corruption and hypocrisy and propose a new
> >>>>> decentralized organization that puts the voice of people
> >>>>> back into their own hands, and not a highly moderated forum
> >>>>> or rich dude's.
> >>>>
> >>>>> * Original openbitco.in <http://openbitco.in/>
> >>>> <http://openbitco.in <http://openbitco.in/>> proposal:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E-hLRcG0pejC4h02BCN_fdXJH3j9AAHziYZHivcmDbU/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> * Current development site: http://openbitco.in
> >>>> <http://openbitco.in/>
> >>>>> * Other site features under construction and
> >>>>> consideration:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ajtx05YrHtIydGZFNzBZVTEtaldZXzNjUXRCZFc1RHc#gid=0
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> * Decentralized openbitco.in <http://openbitco.in/>
> >>>> <http://openbitco.in <http://openbitco.in/>> forum proposal:
> >>>>
> >>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E-hLRcG0pejC4h02BCN_fdXJH3j9AAHziYZHivcmDbU/edit?usp=sharing
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> * For more information or if you'd like to participate with the
> >>>> other
> >>>>> 30 members involved at the moment, PM me for the skype
> >>>>> chatroom.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'd love your guys' opinion on it, even if it's "that will
> >>>>> never work", because it would only be more fun for me when
> >>>>> it does. :)
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hope everyone had fun at the Amsterdam conference we did
> >>>>> last month, we're working on the next 2 and I can't wait to
> >>>>> start the marketplaces up as OpenBitco.in!
> >>>>
> >>>>> Matthew
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM
> >>>>> mailing list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
> >>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> >>>>> list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
> >>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> >>>>> list: http://unsystem.net <http://unsystem.net/>
> >>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> - -- Sincerely,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Cody R. Wilson codywilson@???
> >>>>> <mailto:codywilson@utexas.edu>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The University of Texas School of Law Class of 2014
>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM
> >>>>> mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> >>>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> >>>> list: http://unsystem.net
> >>>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>>>
> >
> >>>>
> >> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> >> list: http://unsystem.net
> >> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> > list: http://unsystem.net
> > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
> >
>
> - --
> Abolish the NSA
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem