Cool. Do you know any memorable articles, videos or resources about
this? Doesn't have to be exactly Bitcoin related.

On 29/10/13 20:51, Robert Williamson wrote:
> Mainly how it is agnostic to who, or what you are sending value to,
> it handles just like hand-to-hand cash transfers, without middlemen
> to tax or refuse the transaction (unless you include miners).
>
> Also, the anonymity, satoshis original vision seemed to be for all
> transactions to be to new public keys/addresses, via the pay to IP
> address feature. However since this was insecure and had no
> authentication, people ended up turning to address-reuse, which
> seriously affects their privacy. We should focus on something that
> addresses these issues, deterministic wallets can help massively
> with protecting against address reuse and against losing keys.
>
> Also prepare yourselves, a bubble is coming.
> http://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/1pgr6p/man_buys_27_of_bitcoin_forgets_about_them_finds/
>
> Thanks Bob
>
> On 29 October 2013 19:10, Amir Taaki <genjix@???
> <mailto:genjix@riseup.net>> wrote:
>
> What are the most important values for you all about Bitcoin?
>
> On 29/10/13 20:08, jindq1 wrote:
>> Boom! Rationality is kind of scarce in bitcoin-land though. It's
>> easier to just blame everything on bankers.
>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Benjamin Cordes
>> <benjamin.l.cordes@???
>> <mailto:benjamin.l.cordes@gmail.com>
> <mailto:benjamin.l.cordes@gmail.com
> <mailto:benjamin.l.cordes@gmail.com>>>
>> wrote:
>
>> No need to troll here. If you have experience using Bitcoin,
>> which I assume you do if you float opinions, you pay a fee. First
>> of all there is a tiny mining fee, which goes to professional
>> miners. You can call them names the whole day, but they support
>> the network. Then you have another fee which goes to exchanges.
>> It is around 0.50% in the best case. Instead of paying 0.50% to a
>> corporation located in Japan you could pay the same fee to a
>> public source, which has a lock-in to support the network. So,
>> sure, Bitcoin is very free in your mind, but if there is also
>> this thing called reality. It's very interesting to me, that some
>> who say Bitcoin is perfect are very quick to defend the same kind
>> of structures they so decry. Rational thought requires weighing
>> arguments.
>
>
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 7:56 PM, Mike Gogulski
>> <mike@???
> <mailto:mike@gogulski.com>
>> <mailto:mike@gogulski.com <mailto:mike@gogulski.com>>> wrote:
>
>> On 10/29/2013 01:46 PM, aimee@???
> <mailto:aimee@aimeemaree.com>
>> <mailto:aimee@aimeemaree.com <mailto:aimee@aimeemaree.com>>
>> wrote:
>>> I declare that I have paid Amir 500bitcoins which equates to
>> 1500AU
>>> and he declares on his tax that he was paid 500 bitcoins which
>>> equates to 2000pound...
>
>> Or he doesn't declare "his" tax, and you don't declare your
>> payment, and the bastards Amir mentioned toward whom all money
>> flows get nothing.
>
>
>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
>> list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
>> list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
>> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
>> list: http://unsystem.net
>> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ unSYSTEM mailing
> list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>

- --
Abolish the NSA