>>     I spoke with his parents for two hours:

>>     https://www.rossulbricht.org/ross-ulbrichts-parents-say-zero-chance-of-murder-for-hire/

>>     On 10/04/2013 12:41 PM, Juraj Bednar wrote:
>>     > Hi,
>>     >
>>     >> The Maryland document clearly states it was an undercover FBI agent.

>>     >>
>>     > Yet it clearly says that the undercover agent arranged the delivery, but
>>     > the first person to suggest
>>     > torture and then execution was DPR. I still want to believe that that's
>>     > not the whole story, on the
>>     > other hand, it's a great PR move for influencing the jury.

>>     >
>>     > >From the state point of view, the FBI did their job and after they've
>>     > done it, DPR suggested violence.
>>     > (of course we view the acts of the FBI as violence, but that's not what
>>     > the general public believes
>>     > and it serves their narrative pretty well :(.

>>     >
>>     >> In most countries in the world, entrapment is thrown out of court. You
>>     >> cannot prosecute someone for a crime which the police entrap you into.
>>     > Yet there is nothing to suggest so. In Maryland document, there was even
>>     > no indication of threats
>>     > from the "victim" about releasing documents. DPR was pissed that they
>>     > stole some money and that
>>     > they could "sing".

>>     >
>>     > Sort-of prisoner's dilemma, but clearly no direct reaction to any
>>     > particular threat.
>>     >> They aren't basing their case on attempted murder. So what was the
>>     >> purpose of engineering this situation with DPR?
>>     > Influence of jury decision and public opinion of course.
>>     >> Go and research what DPR is like as a person. Watch his interview
>>     >> online where he is talking about true love and his hopes for the
>>     >> future of the world. Read some his writings.
>>     > His writings are writings of an idealist. We all read it and believed
>>     > that it says what we
>>     > think. There is always a difference between what someone writes and what
>>     > he or she
>>     > does. This is not to blame or to praise Ross as a person. DPR was and is
>>     > an act.
>>     > It may root from his beliefs, but he will be judged as a person based on
>>     > his actions,
>>     > not based on his beliefs.

>>     >
>>     > We can discuss if the trial is unbiased and serves justice and not only
>>     > the state. It will
>>     > almost certainly be biased on the state side, because the state sees
>>     > drug trade as
>>     > something bad and some people including me, most of the vendors and
>>     > customers
>>     > and himself see it otherwise.

>>     >
>>     > Ross was a real person and they are basing their
>>     > case on real person and his mistakes. They are winning the public
>>     > opinion part pretty
>>     > well. :(
>>     >> Interview with DPR (left): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33fxHA-FEYg

>>     >>
>>     > This is an interview with Ross and I believe these are different
>>     > entities. We may discuss
>>     > if DPR or Ross was an act, but one of them was.
>>     >> By judging DPR, you are buying the picture that has been painted for
>>     >> you to slant the public discourse. Remove yourself from that game.
>>     >> This moral dilemma is false.
>>     > The dilemma is not false.

>>     >
>>     > But I agree we cannot judge DPR because we have no unbiased information
>>     > regarding the
>>     > case and we don't have any moral authority to judge him.

>>     >
>>     > Where are the victims? Let them speak or show that they are missing.
>>     > Otherwise, it's a witch-hunt.

>>     >

>>     >
>>     >    J.

>>     >

>>     >
>>     > _______________________________________________
>>     > unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>     > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem

>>     _______________________________________________
>>     unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>     https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem