>>>    I spoke with his parents for two hours:

>>>    https://www.rossulbricht.org/ross-ulbrichts-parents-say-zero-chance-of-murder-for-hire/

>>>    On 10/04/2013 12:41 PM, Juraj Bednar wrote:
>>>> Hi,

>>>>> The Maryland document clearly states it was an undercover FBI
>>>    agent.
>>>> Yet it clearly says that the undercover agent arranged the
>>>    delivery, but
>>>> the first person to suggest
>>>> torture and then execution was DPR. I still want to believe that
>>>    that's
>>>> not the whole story, on the
>>>> other hand, it's a great PR move for influencing the jury.

>>>>> From the state point of view, the FBI did their job and after
>>>    they've
>>>> done it, DPR suggested violence.
>>>> (of course we view the acts of the FBI as violence, but that's
>>>    not what
>>>> the general public believes
>>>> and it serves their narrative pretty well :(.

>>>>> In most countries in the world, entrapment is thrown out of
>>>    court. You
>>>>> cannot prosecute someone for a crime which the police entrap
>>>    you into.
>>>> Yet there is nothing to suggest so. In Maryland document, there
>>>    was even
>>>> no indication of threats
>>>> from the "victim" about releasing documents. DPR was pissed that
>>>    they
>>>> stole some money and that
>>>> they could "sing".

>>>> Sort-of prisoner's dilemma, but clearly no direct reaction to any
>>>> particular threat.
>>>>> They aren't basing their case on attempted murder. So what was the
>>>>> purpose of engineering this situation with DPR?
>>>> Influence of jury decision and public opinion of course.
>>>>> Go and research what DPR is like as a person. Watch his interview
>>>>> online where he is talking about true love and his hopes for the
>>>>> future of the world. Read some his writings.
>>>> His writings are writings of an idealist. We all read it and
>>>    believed
>>>> that it says what we
>>>> think. There is always a difference between what someone writes
>>>    and what
>>>> he or she
>>>> does. This is not to blame or to praise Ross as a person. DPR
>>>    was and is
>>>> an act.
>>>> It may root from his beliefs, but he will be judged as a person
>>>    based on
>>>> his actions,
>>>> not based on his beliefs.

>>>> We can discuss if the trial is unbiased and serves justice and
>>>    not only
>>>> the state. It will
>>>> almost certainly be biased on the state side, because the state sees
>>>> drug trade as
>>>> something bad and some people including me, most of the vendors and
>>>> customers
>>>> and himself see it otherwise.

>>>> Ross was a real person and they are basing their
>>>> case on real person and his mistakes. They are winning the public
>>>> opinion part pretty
>>>> well. :(
>>>>> Interview with DPR (left):
>>>    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33fxHA-FEYg
>>>> This is an interview with Ross and I believe these are different
>>>> entities. We may discuss
>>>> if DPR or Ross was an act, but one of them was.
>>>>> By judging DPR, you are buying the picture that has been
>>>    painted for
>>>>> you to slant the public discourse. Remove yourself from that game.
>>>>> This moral dilemma is false.
>>>> The dilemma is not false.

>>>> But I agree we cannot judge DPR because we have no unbiased
>>>    information
>>>> regarding the
>>>> case and we don't have any moral authority to judge him.

>>>    _______________________________________________
>>>    unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
>>>    https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem