16:34 <@cjd> http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/
16:35 <@cjd> The reason? “They were thinking that this computing breakthrough was going to give them the ability to crack current public
             encryption.”
16:35 <@cjd> lulz RIP RSA
16:35 <@ircerr> which makes me wonder about demanding site ssl certs. did they already know there is content they want for court but need to
                show they read it via the stolen certs vs explaining they dont need them? or just a trick to make ppl think they do need the
                certs by requesting them and letting it leak
16:36 <@cjd> http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/05/nsa-gchq-encryption-codes-security
16:36 <@cjd> stated a 2010 GCHQ document. "Vast amounts of encrypted internet data which have up till now been discarded are now exploitable."
16:36 <@cjd> 2 sources
16:37 <@cjd> ircerr: it's weird, the NSA gets data which the FBI can't haz so the FBI is jelly and then they gotta bang heads together to get
             the same shit that the NSA already has
16:38 <@ircerr> yea. that'd make sense.
16:38 <@cjd> TOR is so fucked