That's kind of breathtaking, Matthew.

Might I offer that political economy isn't the only grid by which we should
evaluate the concept?


On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 8:36 AM, JINDQ1 <jindq1@???> wrote:

> I'd love to mock them (because it's easy), but if you want to play the
> game created by old dudes who still think IP address = single person,
> you'll have to follow all the rules.
>
> The real question is, is being anonymous good for society? I haven't seen
> a single benefit of anonymity (lacking any verification documents) that
> isn't highly outweighed by it's ability to enable abuse. Human beings may
> be nameless, but they're not non-quantifiable. Is there a way to remove the
> names and keep the verifiable quantity that doesn't make the libertarians
> twitch and squirm?
>
> Matthew
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my Samsung Galaxy Tab
>
> Cody R Wilson <codywilson@???> wrote:
> Thought I'd just mark the occasion. Coinbase is now requiring identity
> documents to verify class 2 account holders.
>
> Glorious compliance!
>
> --
> Sincerely,
>
> Cody R. Wilson
> codywilson@???
>
> The University of Texas School of Law
> Class of 2014
>
> _______________________________________________
> unSYSTEM mailing list: http://unsystem.net
> https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/unsystem
>
>


--
Sincerely,

Cody R. Wilson
codywilson@???

The University of Texas School of Law
Class of 2014