Very valuable thoughts Jaromil,

reading you I see that J&J interest might not be in origins, but in
process that created brico community. It was not a call that was made
from one original organization or institution that initiated Bricos in
pyramidal fashion to create a discipline. It is a self-organized, word
of mouth, interest-sphere organism where relations were perhaps its
process of birth, and are its growth and its affluence.

Best

Kruno
> On Fri, 24 May 2013, Felipe Fonseca wrote:
>
>> I think it's also worth asking whether or not it is actually an
>> "option", and how persistent it is. Do I call myself brico? When,
>> with whom, against which alternatives? Am I more brico than
>> metareciclagem? Or both? Or none?
>>
>> Identities, multiplicities, belonging, building...
> I think the question on how one has arrived is wrong, with all respect
> for J&J doing lots of very good stuff and the BRICO reader being just a
> great thing.. I'm not interested in this social-network approach of
> understanding how things are born, there is no actual value in the
> origin of things if not the projection of the one-self which is an
> individualist archetipe per-se.
>
> What InI is interested is the process, not the origin. Is a fertile
> present, not a crystallized amber past. Is the affluent community, not
> the founding members. Is the story, not the history. Is how to make
> peace, not who started the war.
>
> ciao
> _______________________________________________
> Brico mailing list
> Website on http://www.bricolabs.net
> Unsubscribe: https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/brico
>


--
URBANA KULTURA I EDUKACIJA - www.uke.hr
GentleJunk blog - http://gentlejunk.net
Projects - http://gentlejunk.net/projects
Netlabel - http://netlabel.gentlejunk.net