Im sorry, please ignore my message below....of course we have string params.

I just woke up an my brain was still booting up :D


Salsaman.


On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 08:20, salsaman <salsaman@???> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 07:14, Jaromil <jaromil@???> wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012, Dan Dennedy wrote:
>>
>>> There is nothing wrong with string params. There is not much we can
>>> do about old, unmaintained hosts that tried to support them before
>>> there was actually any in existence and now do not agree to the
>>> current spec. If you recall, the addition of the first string param
>>> revealed problems in the original spec and had to impose some rules
>>> about memory management.
>
> Are you saying the current spec now has string params ? If so that is
> news to me, and can I ask (again) that in future such things are
> discussed and agreed on the mailing list (or at least notified) before
> adding to the spec.
>
> As I pointed out before, not everybody has time to read every
> iteration of the header file to keep up with any changes.
>
> Salsaman.
>
>
>
>>
>> ACK. thanks, it was actually a matter of recalling that.
>>
>>> I am a member of this new list.
>>
>> everyone on the old list is here and is reading this.
>>
>> is just a matter of choosing the destination address or update to
>> frei0r@??? in the addressbook. whatever people chooses, I'm
>> forced to communicate through this channel, just tried replying on the
>> old one, but mails aren't passing through.
>>
>> ciao
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Frei0r mailing list - http://frei0r.dyne.org
>> Free video plugins, minimal and cross-platform.
>> http://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/frei0r