:: Re: [dyne:bolic] Dynebolic default …
Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: a5'
Date:  
À: dynebolic mailinglist
Sujet: Re: [dyne:bolic] Dynebolic default WM
Hi,

sorry about the odd formatting, I erased the message by accident:

I started to put this together

http://www.delicious.com/stacks/view/PbAV1R

to aid in configuring the software;

I don't have the means to install/run dynebolic right now but in a few
days I can probably do so.

Not really sure what is needed and or intended to configure openbox for
dynebolic, is there just X or Xfree86, and then openbox or is there
something in between?

a5'

tWo CeNts /
           -
            -




Author: dreamer
Date: 2011-11-20 18:38 -500
To: dynebolic mailinglist
Subject: Re: [dyne:bolic] Dynebolic default WM
Ok, so it seems there is enough interest to actually try and get a
configuration started.
We have some nostalgia here, some minimalism there, easy and clean for teh
noobs and elite configuration for the r34l h4ck3rs.

So, how do we go about collaborating for a configuration? All I know from
Dyne is the live-distro so how can we install and config?

Any ideas are greatly welcomed :)



On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 12:16 AM, a5' <a59303@???> wrote:

> hadn't really seen openbox- looks very cool.
> like I remember seeing x windows in the past.
>
> a5
>
> >> > @dreamer
> >> > I think LXDE and similar wm's is more what the user wants to see as
> >> > well. Never really got into the comfiguration of bb too much but I
> >> > think its pretty nat. Honestly when I first ran dynebolic I was
> >> > impressed and surprised at the
> >> > useability of it (Xfce).
> >
> > there are interesting opinions about DE and audio production (and video
> > production by extension) in linuxMusician forum http://is.gd/msf5il
> >
> > personally, i agree that dynebolic is a creation lab, a nomadic and
> > audiovisual tool .. there's no necessity to have fancy apps eating you
> > resources just to twet what's happening under you ass :)) so,, the
> > less is the better to concentrate you on the creation process... to me
> > any of the Box family (i love openbox+lxde) works very well








> hadn't really seen openbox- looks very cool.
> like I remember seeing x windows in the past.
>
> a5
>
>>> > @dreamer
>>> > I think LXDE and similar wm's is more what the user wants to see as
>>> > well. Never really got into the comfiguration of bb too much but I
>>> > think its pretty nat. Honestly when I first ran dynebolic I was
>>> > impressed and surprised at the
>>> > useability of it (Xfce).
>>