Being inspired by many people and conversations on this list I set out to do some good in June this year
Personally supervised transfer of a network of 35 computers from pirated propriatory software to open software at our office where we run a family business
This journey ahs been very difficult, has involved convincing users to shift vision, get windows happy admin to get used to code, learn stuff myself inorder to prevent vindictive users to purposely screw up and waste time
And. Now I'm finding the linux consultants working with me to have a different set of ethics too which is much cleaner than the others
I'm hoping that by taking this step a positive initiative has taken place and believe me we are still trouble shooting our machines, the software etc, Every week I'm giving about 8 hrs of my time to resolve these issues
-----Original Message-----
From: august <august@???>
Sender: brico-bounces@???
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:04:56
To: Bricolabs startup mailinglist<brico@???>
Reply-To: Bricolabs startup mailinglist <brico@???>
Subject: Re: [Bricolabs] carrot workers guide
Hi,
This is my first post to the list. I've been listening now for over
a month. I'm a creative technologist living in Oakland, California.
I devote a lot of my energy to art and free software.
Efe,
I couldn't agree with you more. Recently, I find myself in arguments
with the 30%. They are often of my same type, 30ish with
post-graduate degrees. I try my best to understand their line of
reasoning, but only with mixed success.
Spoken or unspoken, they often imply two things that represent their
belief structures. First, they say that absolute equality is not
possible - because of our "animal spirits" and relative mistrust of
one another, jealousy, etc. there will always be a world where some
have more than others. Secondly, they all seem to feel that the
majority of the poor are just lazy.
On the first argument, I kind of agree. Some will always be able to
do more than others. Jealousy about effort and pay could destroy a
system. However, if I propose to them a maximum wage of some sort,
where there can still be (even large) imbalances of wealth, but not
to an excessive degree, they reject this flat out. They seem to
think that capping the wealth that a person can accrue in any way
would be detrimental to progress and productivity.
I then ask them to consider a world where we make less, work less,
and stress less. Couldn't a maximum wage aid such a goal, less work
for all? Perhaps less productivity. The argument digresses from
here saying it would be too difficult to implement.
On the second argument, they seem to believe most people in the world
are lazy. The righteous go so far to say "you only have a right to
critique the billionaires when you yourself have EARNED a billion
dollars" I then mention statistics that over 50% of billionaires
were born into their wealth and that upward class mobility is the
lowest it has been in the US.
These are just two re-occurring themes I've noticed here in the States.
There are more. Of course, very few here see the international
scope. I try to keep myself informed of the various interrelated
economic systems, but its really not easy. I know my arguments are
also incomplete and inexact, probably even naive. It's simply too
big of a problem, and I am only one piece in the puzzle.
I'd be curious to know what kind of conversations you are having.
I guess I am personally looking for some more focus than just some
fuzzy and perhaps abstract discontent with the 1% ... or 30%.
-august black.
Felipe Fonseca say:
> I don't care that much about the 1% (as I'm sure I will never
> convince or even reach them). But those, say, 30%, who follow the 1%
> unknowingly, repeat every stupidity they utter and tunr the world
> into prejudice and hatred. These are people I see everyday, live
> with, talk about things of life. And they feel so right it scares
> me.
>
> efe
>
> Em 09-11-2011 18:58, Jaromil escreveu:
> >On Wed, 09 Nov 2011, John Hopkins wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>>Yes you hear me, I'm talking about *conflict*.
> >>
> >>shall I give instruction on the art of being a sniper?
> >
> >not that far John. if I was ever up to open real holes in people's
> >heads then my life would have been way different from what it is now
> >and probably much worst and less effective in changing things, even if
> >I'm horribly good at aiming. Firearms aren't at all effective.
> >
> >I'm talking about a worldwide moment of superficial, basic yet
> >powerful and widespread protest against the so called 1% and I'm
> >talking about the role of cultural mediators.
> >
> >why should we mediate for peace? what is that they call peace? is
> >there a game we are really playing? I don't see it even worth being
> >called a game. as far as I understand that's also why many of us are
> >busy making new playing fields (from currencies from occupied public
> >space). But what I'm asking is about the other side of the coin: why
> >should we coop with this shit and hypocrisy that is thrown at us?
> >
> >have we drawn a line? how far?
> >
> >sniping is lame, that's what diplomats and beaurocrats do already.
> >
> >I prefer a good old punch in the solar plexus.
> >Or a stampede of gnus.
> >
> >ciao
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Brico mailing list
> >Brico@???
> >http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico
> _______________________________________________
> Brico mailing list
> Brico@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico
--
http://aug.ment.org
GPG: 0A8D 2BC7 243D 57D0 469D 9736 C557 458F 003E 6952
_______________________________________________
Brico mailing list
Brico@???
http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico