I've been at Occupy Wall Street for nearly everyday since it began and
engage in a wide variety of activities from tech to sanitation and GA
politics. This article doesn't do anything for me.

For one - "Occupy the World"...? Completely misses the point. Occupy your
space and your life is more like it. I don't think this movement will ever
"Occupy the World" - what it will do is connect local organizers to each
other so they can occupy their spaces in some type of loose coordination.
The semantics are important. Occupying the World implies some type of
global decision making body when I think precisely the opposite is taking
place. The movement is empowering localities to organize themselves - not
to Occupy the World but rather to Occupy Everywhere - Together.

Second, and this might be more true for New York than other places. The
"Left" - at least operationally - is feeble. They don't uinderstand
self-determined action. A pretty substantial "left" political
organizer/communications consultant came up to me a few days ago to tell me
he'd been looking for the tech/strategy people for a week and couldn't find
anyone. He literally said to me: "I'm a bureaucrat, what can I do?" He
doesn't get it. I watch "left" organizers tweek out daily because they can't
operate in an unstructured anarchy and are constantly trying to find a
center that doesn't exist. In practice, this is more PorcFest than it is
Left Forum.

That being said, this article gets it right in a few places.

1.
Faced by these twin challenges, the world’s middle-classes
> might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape
> transnational processes in their own class interest.â€

Yes - this is an open source revolution.

2.
We're going to achieve William Morris's dream articulated in 'useful work
vs. useless toil,' but I think it'll be through the mechanisms of anarchy,
not socialism.

meanwhile - I've been creating a resource for techies involved in the
occupation. It's getting better: wiki.occupyeverywhere.org

We need lots of help! :)

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Patrice Riemens <patrice@???> wrote:

> Hi Bricos,
>
> Found this on the Sarai Reader list, x-posted it to nettime, and got a
> mail back from Brian Holmes saying it was the best analysis around
> 'occupy' he had seen yet ...
>
> So enjoy & think...
>
> Cheers, patrizio & Diiiinooos!
>
>
>
> On 10/21/2011 12:58 AM, Patrice Riemens wrote:
> > Bwo Sarai Reader list/ A.Mani
> >
> >
> > http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=27157
> >
> > Occupy The World! To the Barricades Comrades?
> >
> > by William Bowles
> >
> >
> > Four years ago in a Ministry of Defence Review, the Whitehall Mandarins,
> > more astutely than any so-called Lefty, determined the following:
> >

> >      “The Middle Class Proletariat — The middle classes could become
> a
> > revolutionary class, taking the role envisaged for the proletariat by
> > Marx. The globalization of labour markets and reducing levels of
> > national welfare provision and employment could reduce peoples’
> > attachment to particular states. The growing gap between themselves and
> > a small number of highly visible super-rich individuals might fuel
> > disillusion with meritocracy, while the growing urban under-classes are
> > likely to pose an increasing threat to social order and stability, as
> > the burden of acquired debt and the failure of pension provision begins
> > to bite. Faced by these twin challenges, the world’s middle-classes
> > might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and skills to shape
> > transnational processes in their own class interest.â€

> >
> > — ‘UK Ministry of Defence report, The DCDC Global Strategic Trends
> > Programme 2007-2036’ (Third Edition) p.96, March 2007
> >
> > Yeah, I know, I'm always using this quote (I first used it four years
> > ago) but it illustrates the great intellectual divide between the
> > political class and the citizens they rule, including our Left, now made
> > so apparent by what the pundits are now calling the 'Occupy The World'
> > (OTW) movement. It seems that only our very own ruling class foresaw
> > OTW.
> >
> > Dig a little deeper into OTW and we find that with a few exceptions,
> > there are no challenges to capitalism, mostly it's a 'clean up your act'
> > kinda thing. Throw a few billionaires in jail, add some regulation and
> > things will eventually turn out just fine. Dream on...
> >
> > But we've been here before. This is what attempts at 'reforming'
> > capitalism in the past have looked like. We lived under such a system
> > from 1945 until the late 1970s, before the Empire reasserted itself,
> > proving once again, that concepts like 'democracy' under capitalism, are
> > at best, mere conveniences and so vague a concept that it can be made to
> > resemble almost anything.
> >
> > And once the so-called Good Life that capitalism allegedly had offered
> > us started to wear thin and capitalism once more plunged us into war and
> > poverty, so too the 'Good Life' had to be dumped. Belt-tightening time
> > again.
> >
> > But unlike 1968, or even the 'Anti-Globalization Movement' that some are
> > comparing OTW to, socialism is barely mentioned, let alone the central
> > motif. Yes, there are increasing anti-capitalist references but in 1968,
> > politics was at the very heart of the situation. It wasn't about money
> > but about posing a real alternative to capitalism. The concept of
> > belonging to a class still existed in the public's consciousness, even
> > if it lacked the collective will to do anything about it.
> >
> > Am I being altogether too cruel to OTW? It is after all, early days in
> > the development of OTW. It might all fizzle out or if it doesn't, the
> > political class might have to use the logical response to the MoD's
> > quote above: suppress it. Something for which, no doubt in another
> > (secret) report, the Whitehall Mandarins have laid out the strategy and
> > tactics to be employed in suppressing a burgeoning (socialist?)
> > revolution.
> >
> > After all, when "[f]aced by th[o]se twin challenges, the world’s
> > middle-classes might unite, using access to knowledge, resources and
> > skills to shape transnational processes in their own class interest†,
> > says it all.
> >
> > You have to take this stuff seriously! It's not a game and the state is
> > very adept at employing whatever tactics it chooses to suppress serious
> > dissent including the use of agents provocateurs (a long-standing
> > 'tradition') to infiltrate and provoke pointless confrontations with the
> > state, in order not only to justify suppression but more importantly, as
> > part of a propaganda war waged through the media, where we have no
> > counter-voice.
> >
> > Repression of course carries its own risks and far from being a solution
> > could only further excerbate the problem. Timing is all. This is not a
> > game. The political class is fighting for its life and that of its
> > masters, the corporations. That's why they write those reports. Just as
> > with the insurrections earlier this year in the UK, the state had a
> > clear response to it and the role of the media was central to its
> > effectiveness in spreading the state's message.
> >
> > Let it 'burn baby, burn' and turn the world's cameras onto the
> > conflagration, followed by a good dose of Victorian 'rough justice'
> > (pity they've abolished hard labour and deportation to Australia). Make
> > an example of them should anyone else have ideas about following in
> > their footsteps.
> >
> > The key here is the observation made by the Whitehall Mandarins about
> > "class interests". Now if well-paid and no doubt loyal members of the
> > political class' intelligentsia have gotten it figured out (and so far,
> > their prediction is right on the money), how come the 'Left' hasn't?
> >
> > Currently class is something almost entirely absent from the OTW
> > movement. Without it eventually taking centre stage, OTW is bound to be
> > stillborn. But there are some positive signs that some kind of
> > 'consensus' mechanism is emerging from the chaos akin to some kind of
> > 'self-organizing' principle. After all, we have what the MoD report
> > called "access to knowledge, resources and skills" necessary to produce
> > workable alternatives not only to capitalism but to fashion a new kind
> > of inclusive democracy, one that hasn't existed before.
> >

> >      The aim is to create a venue for democratic deliberation and open
> > debate in a place normally associated with secretive privilege. People
> > working in the City of London have played a starring role in creating
> > the global economic crisis. Since our representative institutions have
> > thus far failed to address this crisis in a way that is both sensible
> > and just, it is only fitting that we should use the City as a place in
> > which [to] work on solutions ourselves. -- 'Talk Amongst Yourselves' By
> > Dan Hind

> >
> > It's not a 'peasants revolt' kinda thing, though of course inevitably
> > those hit the worst by the crisis will revolt first. But the crisis of
> > capital has now hit those who make up the very bedrock of capitalist
> > society's justification for existing, its so-called middle classes.
> > These are the major consumers in our economy, not only is their
> > consumption a major chunk of our GDP (as well its debt), they are also
> > the managers and technicians of capitalism and the state machine. Piss
> > them off and things could get out of hand just as the MoD has predicted.
> >
> > Some on the Left in the UK are still calling for revitalizing the Labour
> > Party as a potential force for socialism but if so, then it means that
> > it would have to come from its decimated grassroots membership, a tall
> > if not impossible order to carry out. At the first signs of revolt in
> > the Labour Party's constituency membership, the Party Machine will
> > intervene and purge its ranks just as it has done so many times in the
> > past.
> >
> > For a Left largely pinning its hopes on a working class that no longer
> > exists, it will have to broaden and deepen its knowledge of how
> > capitalism has evolved and transformed the nature of the working class
> > and learn to seek connections to a much more diverse and complex
> > alliance of forces if we are to defeat the Empire.
> >
> > What an irony that the Left—led largely by middle class
> > intellectuals—fails to see what has happened, trapped as it is in its
> > own patronizing and nostalgic vision of the working class aka George
> > 'middle class' Orwell's 'Road to Wigan Pier'. And this is the problem:
> > it's always middle class intellectuals on the Left who have set the
> > agenda, not for their own 'class' mind but for an idea that emerged in
> > the middle of the 19th century; that the organized industrial working
> > class would undertake the Revolution, led of course by middle class
> > intellectuals.
> >
> > OTW is nevertheless a transcendent moment, one to cherish and sustain
> > and no doubt just the first shot across the bows of Global Capital but
> > for it to have a chance of success it will have challenge corporate
> > capitalism's right to exist.
> >
> > To do this we will first have to dispel the 'bad apple' theory as the
> > cause of the current crisis. That it's just a question of regulating
> > capitalism, smoothing out the rough edges, eliminating the extremes and
> > above all, restoring 'competition', so-called real capitalism.
> >
> > But this could only be done by breaking up the giant corporations and
> > abolishing the financial sector in its entirety as it currently exists.
> > Is it likely that advocates of 'real' capitalism aka Max Keisser could
> > undertake such a mission? The way I understand it, a 'real' capitalist
> > economy would consist only of small competing private businesses,
> > cooperatives, public utilities and the self-employed, and one assumes
> > massive state intervention in order to make it all happen.
> >
> > Sounds a bit like my favourite kind of socialism, William Morris's
> > version and not an overly ambitious objective given the political will
> > to carry it out.
> >
> > But who will break up Shell or Goldman Sachs? Who will smash the
> > military-industrial-media complex? Only a state owned and managed by the
> > working class can undertake such a momentous task. OTY OTW...
> >
> >
> > # distributed via<nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> _______________________________________________
> Brico mailing list
> Brico@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico
>



--
Devin Balkind
Director, Sarapis Foundation
devin@???
@devinbalkind