Are we talking about customizing the contents of the menu or the entries
themselves?

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 2:56 PM, sayhi2guy@??? <
sayhi2guy@???> wrote:

> Hi
> I would seriously consider bailing out of Gnome the way things are
> going. Xfce is highly customisable. Also worth a serious look is LXDE
> & the Lubuntu version of Ubuntu that uses this, which uses far less
> memory: this is probably what I will use when my current Ubuntu LTS
> install reaches end of support.
>
> Sorry if this sounds a bit grim so
> far into beta, but may it be less work than forking something.
> cheers
> G
>
>
> >----Original Message----
> >From: jaromil@???
> >Date: 27/09/2011 14:
> 43
> >To: "dynebolic mailinglist"<dynebolic@???>
> >Subj: [dyne:
> bolic] how to customize the application menu?
> >
> >
> >re all,
> >
> >an open
> question, hope someone has an answer: as Guy noticed in a
> >previous
> mail, since we switched to Gnome the menu became quite
> >unusable. The
> Video section for instance is too big and more in
> >general the way it
> is organized is worst than what we had before in
> >dyne:bolic before.
> >
>
> >i've looked into .desktop files organization and realized that in
>
> >Gnome 2 and "thanks" to the freedesktop standard, we are not free to
>
> >customize the organization of the desktop menu... absurd!
> >
> >am i
> wrong here, or does somoene knows the solution to this riddle?
> >
> >are
> we forced to change panel? should we modify / fork the Gnome
> >panel?!
> is there already someone doing that??
> >
> >ciao
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >jaromil,
> dyne.org developer, http://jaromil.dyne.org>GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7
> 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39
>
> >_______________________________________________
> >dynebolic mailing
> list
> >dynebolic@???
> >http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic>
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
>