:: Re: [dyne:bolic] Does the kernel ha…
トップ ページ
このメッセージを削除
このメッセージに返信
著者: Hal
日付:  
To: dynebolic mailinglist
題目: Re: [dyne:bolic] Does the kernel have rt optimizations?
Is there are chance to have jack tools in one interface instead of
separated? There are many. Together they are like logic but, they are
not logic (emagic). so is there a tool which gets all jack stuff in
one folder, and launchable from one interface?
Is it worth it?

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 9:56 PM, sayhi2guy@???
<sayhi2guy@???> wrote:
>>----Original Message----
>>From: jaromil@???
>>Date: 11/09/2011 12:
> 32
>>To: "dynebolic mailinglist"<dynebolic@???>
>>Subj: Re:
> [dyne:bolic] Does the kernel have rt optimizations?
>>
>>
>>hi Rick,
>>
>>On
> Sat, 10 Sep 2011, Rick Bolen (GM) wrote:
>>
>>> I'm very happy to see
> this update.
>>
>>Hehe :) I'm surprised and happy to see all our
> community stays around
>>even without updates for 5 years and then all
> of a sudden we are all
>>still here and the spirit of this place is
> alive :D
>>
>>> Q:
>>> Is the 3.0.1-libredyne kernel a real-time kernel?
>>
>
>>no! one of the reasons why we call it beta still.
>>
>>
>>at the time of
> dyne:II I was more up to date with this kernel
>>development and out of
> knowing the options around I've adopted the
>>great patches that Con
> Kolivas was doing. Unfortunately he left the
>>scene now and I don't
> know anymore which are the best realtime patches
>>now.
>>
> (snip)
>
> The
> good news is that, whilst an rt kernel is best, a lot of rt capability
> is in the mainline kernel now & you should be able to run jack in
> realtime on a stock kernel ( http://jackaudio.org/realtime_vs_realtime_kernel
> ).  I have done so on several distros ( not tested it yet on the latest
> d:b - hoping to download it tonight.)
>
> I guess it all depends on what
> you are doing & how low you need your latency to be.
>
> regards
>
> Guy
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
>