2011/9/11 Jaromil <jaromil@???>: > On Fri, 09 Sep 2011, Hal wrote:
>
>> the linux revision for the kernel numbers use odd and even as stable
>> and unstable
>> thus 3.99.808 would be unstable, and 3.98.909 would be stable
>>
>> worth including?
>
> we are still in time to decide this, i wish to adopt what is most
> intuitive for people around, also those who do not know linux scheme
> of versioning... so basically i thought of no distinction between odd
> and even just a progression in beta and then, if worth, tag it stable.
>
> ciao
>
> --
> jaromil, dyne.org developer, http://jaromil.dyne.org > GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6 8E39
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic >