:: Re: [dyne:bolic] world's largest ro…
Página superior
Eliminar este mensaje
Responder a este mensaje
Autor: Giftmischer
Fecha:  
A: Secretary, dynebolic mailinglist
Asunto: Re: [dyne:bolic] world's largest robot orchestra // Re: guitar tuner?
Hi there & actually there's no guitar tuner module on
http://giftmischer.isgreat.org/dyne/modules/

As an occasionally guitar player myself I appreciate what Jaromil wrote -
but for the usual 'the-tuning-has-to-be-very-quick' scenario I use these
tiny flat Korg devices.

But I'll give creating a guitar tuner module a serious thought - until I
have a system w/ hd drives. Tomorrow. (Currently I run d:b w/ CD drives
and an usb nest and university userspace (via SSH) for data storage.)

If any of you has problems creating d:b 2.5.2 modules don't hesitate to
ask me for hints and workarounds.

I love dynebolic.

Greetings to you all!

(especially to
Jaromil - d:b is just an amazing linux distro! &
Ryan - for distributing my early modules)

Gifti


On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:01:23 -0000, 2.be dotBE <maiL.Lists@???> wrote:

> For a bit of trivia on what a such tuner might be
> good for, for someone other than Beethoven ;)
>
> Logos' M&M the world's largest robot orchestra
>
> http://www.logosfoundation.org/mnm/index.html
>
> Let your imagination go,..
>
> [-||| Jaromil |||-] Mused ::
> ~
> ~ hi a5',
> ~
> ~ On Thu, 14 Jul 2011, a5' wrote:
> ~>
> ~> For what its worth the intention was to offer a
> ~> suggestion for the
> ~> new dynebolic because I find it frustrating that
> ~> its the only thing
> ~> it doesn't have...
> ~
> ~
> ~ you are right and back then about 5 years ago while
> ~ rounding up on the
> ~ applications to be included I've given to this a
> ~ thought, especially
> ~ since I also play guitar and strings in general.
> ~
> ~ I did not took the initiative to include it into
> ~ the audio module
> ~ because of my belief on the broader topic of guitar
> ~ tuning: its very
> ~ useful to do it by ear. that way one can really
> ~ train his/her ear for
> ~ notes and, once you know it really you don't need a
> ~ tuner anymore.
> ~
> ~ after having learned to use harmonics for tuning
> ~ (the higher sounds
> ~ produced by soflty touching strings in particular
> ~ positions, makes it
> ~ kind of easier to finetune with more precision) and
> ~ considering there
> ~ is always an A tune diapason in my treasure chest,
> ~ I don't feel the
> ~ need for a semi-automatic guitar tuner.
> ~
> ~ anyway, anyone can do a dyne module and include it,
> ~ or compile it from
> ~ source, or import it from other distributions as
> ~ Guy says.
> ~
> ~ i also recall giftmischer had a guitar tuner dyne
> ~ module in his
> ~ repository.
> ~
> ~ ciao
> ~
> ~ --
> ~ jaromil, dyne.org developer,
> ~ http://jaromil.dyne.org
> ~ GPG: B2D9 9376 BFB2 60B7 601F 5B62 F6D3 FBD9 C2B6
> ~ 8E39
> ~ _______________________________________________
> ~ dynebolic mailing list
> ~ dynebolic@???
> ~ http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
> ~
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic