Hi all,
great another dyne site,
I've managed to write about 70 pages on dyne so far
and when I have a complete solid build I release the
findings.
I'm an artist and environmentalist studied iso so I'll
document it and flowchart, (with my bookmark
collection).
Hopefully this will cut out some ambiguities in linux.
Well it has for me.
On networking cluster farms and kernel compiling.
Stomfi's a great help too. cheers.
the below sentiment sums it up for me too jaromil.
many thanks andy.
(Sci-artist)
"don't split art from craft.
Thats like separating mind from brain."

be a cro-magnon and make your own tools.
outsi the iceman would love dyneabolic.
PS Jaromil they found out he was Italian too.


--- Mobile Penguin <mobilepenguin@???> wrote:

> Thanks for the reply Jaromil, much respect and love!
> The work that dyne is
> doing has inspired me in many ways and i am
> promoting Dyne:bolic wherever i
> can.
>
> I am currently working on setting up the SDK and
> will have a domain and wiki
> in which i will post here for all those interested
> in what i am doing. I
> will do my best to document everything and make the
> binaries and iso image
> available.
>
> Safe travels to all on the road and happy hacking!
>
> cheers!
>
>
> On Jan 16, 2008 1:32 AM, jaromil <jaromil@???>
> wrote:
>
> > > >
> > hi Brian,
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:42:24AM -0500,
> mobilepenguin@??? wrote:
> > > First off i would like to express how much i
> appreciate the work that
> > has
> > > been done. I have only recently stumbled upon
> dyne:bolic and was
> > currently
> > > trying to create my own live cd for multimedia.
> This cd just kicks a**
> >
> > :))
> >
> > > I would really like to use dyne:bolic as
> the base for a small
> > > distribution. It is important that i have
> OpenMosix. I understand
> > > that development is slow with oM for 2.6.x
> and this affects the
> > > types of features and hardware support. I
> would like to use 2.4.18
> > > with my livecd.
> >
> > AFAIK openmosix development has stopped, i'm
> not sure the latest
> > version for linux-2.6.x is really working.
> >
> > OTOH the version for linux-2.4.x is well
> performant, so i consider it
> > a good idea to use that.
> >
> > > Should i use the Dyne:II SDK or start with
> the older version of
> > > dyne:bolic. I am also willing to start from
> scratch if i have too
> > > as i feel SSI clustering is essential.
> > >
> > > Can anyone give me some advice?
> >
> > in case you feel like hacking on it, i suggest
> you compile a 2.4.x
> > kernel for dyne:II - i'm sure that, despite it's a
> older kernel, still
> > many people will benefit from such an effort.
> >
> > in this quest there might be some minor issues
> to be fixed in the
> > core, depending from current udev (ver. >100)
> compatibility with linux
> > 2.4 and other amenities, but all in all i
> believe it is not
> > impossible.
> >
> > full kernel sources (2.6) of dyne:II are
> downloaded when you create
> > the SDK, you can refer to the user manual for
> up-to-date instructions
> > about SDK usage, plus remember the 'dynesdk
> mkkern' command will help
> > you pack automatically a freshly compiled
> kernel into an easy to
> > distribute format for other dyne:II users.
> >
> > keep us posted! and happy hacking :)
> >
> > - --
> > (_ http://jaromil.dyne.org _)
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > dynebolic mailing list
> > dynebolic@???
> > http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
> >
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic
>

      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?  
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.  http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping