2007/6/12, Mike Webb <weeble7591@???>: >
> I've been following the UNSUBSCRIBE thread and have read posts from
> others who are rather unpleased with dyne:bolic, particularly as far
> as support is concerned. From what I'm reading, it sounds like I'm
> unlikely to get some help I was getting ready to ask about.
>
> So I'll ask a different question; presuming that my stay with
> dyne:bolic will be short (I can't even run a shell script as root!)
> what other distros have y'all had experience with that are very low in
> resource demands? I've been using Puppy Linux a lot, but since it
> loads itself completely into RAM, a lot of loading and running of
> programs is slower than dyne:bolic since they have less RAM to play
> with (I'm running a clone with an AMD-K6/2 300 mhz CPU and 256MB of
> RAM).
>
> I love the idea of being able to put the main OS into a directory on a
> FAT32 partition, starting the boot from CD and finishing on the HD
> (and going on to install GRUB if I want to). So where do I go from
> here? Thanks for the help.
> _______________________________________________
> dynebolic mailing list
> dynebolic@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/dynebolic >
::
Re: [dyne:bolic] Other Low-Demand D…
