Carsten, toodude69 et all:

Without attention, trolls are nothing. So,

* Please do not feed the troll *

When you try to reason with a troll, he wins. When you insult a troll, he
wins. When you scream at a troll, he wins. The only thing that trolls
can't handle is being ignored.
A procmail rule throwing his mails to /dev/null is therefore the most
appropiate action.

There is no use answering this message. Let's just stop this thread.

Love,
Quique


On Dom, 25 de Marzo de 2007, 6:37 pm, toodude69 dijo:

> You are a useless waste of time for the police and anybody else. Find
> your rock and crawl back under it.
>
> Maxam CPC <maxamcpc@???> wrote: This is a land of laws. I am
> well within my rights to file a complaint.
> Don't get involved because this here is evidence. He can explain himself
> to the authorities, as will I.
>
> On 3/25/07, Carsten Agger wrote:
>>
>> Maxam, who put that chip on your shoulder?
>>
>> I do suspect the person you're most likely to harm by "filing a
>> complaint with the police" is yourself - and the officers, whose time
>> you'll be wasting.
>>
>> At the dyne.org page where you probably read about this mailing list,
>> a link is provided to these netiquette guidelines:
>>
>> http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>>
>> If you don't think they apply to you, I suspect you may have a hard
>> time of finding a welcome on *any* mailing list.
>>
>> best regards
>> Carsten
>>
>>
>> On 3/25/07, Maxam CPC wrote:
>> > Jaromil,
>> >
>> > How can an unwashed bum like you threaten to defame me? Just how far
>> > do you think you can threaten people on the internet? You have crossed
>> > the line.
>> >
>> > For threatening to hack my computer in your message below I am going
>> > to file a complaint with the police (obtaining unauthorised access to
>> > a computer system is a criminal offence).
>> >
>> > What's your response to that I wonder? Maybe the police are trolls
>> > too?
>> >
>> > Max


--
The assumption that
what currently exists must necessarily exist
is the acid that corrodes all visionary thinking.