-------- Original Message --------

> Thus, at this stage at least one must put Devuan on the same shelf as
> Debian in regards to containing AI slop or not.

Not just AI slop but AI poisoning is a very real possibility that is far easier
against large models than many pretend. I do hope that all commits are closely
checked. Obviously Debians work is very different to Linux but it seems Linus
and other kernel devs can't check all Linux commits these days and mistakes like
the wifi scanning bug and others slip through with others often only caught by
performance degradation tests etc..

>> Witness all the zero days that humans never found that have sat in the queue
waiting for the relatively small set of kernel devs to get to them all.

This simply isn't true. Yes they miss far more than e.g. OpenBSD but it isn't
lack of tooling. Bugs are precise problems and tools to find them exist. AI is
not of real benefit here. You could try to argue on logic bugs but that isn't
what you seem to be talking about. A lot of the rhetoric that AI companies push
is bogus. Ada SPARK would be the kind of tool to solve that.

So which distros are more skeptical towards AI inclusion as I expect that they
will make better decisions in general? I suppose man power is half the reason we
use Debian though and that is largely why they make pretty bad decisions
collectively.

-- 
All the best,
             Kevin Chadwick