Le 21/03/2026 à 08:08, Marin Ivanov a écrit :
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 13:49:43 -0400
> Steve Litt <slitt@???> wrote:
>
>> But if you mean that Rust is a bad language, I'd like to hear why you
>> think that. It's much safer than C, and its compiler messages are much
>> more educational than almost any other language.
> People often make the mistake calling a language (memory-)safe, instead
> of the compiler. You may want to check Fil-C[1], which is a memory-safe
> C and C++ compiler. It has overhead though.
>
    I tend to think that it's the language which allows or not
memory-unsafe constructs. The compiler enforces the language, nothing
less and nothing more. Or the compiler defines another language. Am I
mising something?

--     Didier