:: Re: [DNG] dracut needing a fork? ap…
Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Martin Steigerwald
Date:  
To: dng
Subject: Re: [DNG] dracut needing a fork? apt wants to remove elogind libraries
Greetings, Mark. Greetings.

Mark Hindley - 11.03.26, 17:38:08 CET:
> On Wed, Feb 25, 2026 at 04:56:05PM +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > For now I let apt hold back the package.
>
> I have just discovered tiny-initramfs[1] which in unencumbered by
> systemd. I just highlight it as another avenue to explore whilst we are
> waiting for elogind upstream.


Hmm, great! Anyone having any experience with that?

I might just try it. I welcome a more minimal approach to initramfs as
long as it works. :)

Not sure whether that very trivial module loading support without
automatic dependency resolution would be suitable for a laptop unless I
chose to compile everything in that the system needs to mount /.

Hmmm, may not work see "When not to use":

https://github.com/chris-se/tiny-initramfs/

So would only work with self-compiled kernels I think. And even then… when
/ is on LVM probably bad luck.

> [1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tiny-initramfs


On another note: I would prefer to go without libsystemd0 when using
elogind… but if it does increase maintenance cost beyond a reasonable
limit I understand.

Best,
--
Martin