> On 6 Nov 2025, at 21:50, Didier Kryn <kryn@???> wrote:
>
> <rant>
>

>     Ah! I always wondered what apt brought in that was better than apt-get. Is there anything other than a different and misleading wording?

>
> </rant>
>

> --     Didier

apt has a UX designed for interactive use but the output is not entirely stable. Hence, apt-get is still recommended for scripting purposes where the output needs to be piped/redirected.

Horses for courses though, as I believe they both use the same dependency resolving algorithm?

Tom