<nettime> renewal of democratic politics
From: d.garcia - Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2014 10:29:04 +0100
After the carnival like excitement around the Scottish referendum the clich? that is echoing around mainstream media discourse is that that politics in the UK can now never be the same again. That new levels of voter and popular participation in a political process has surpassed anything we have seen in recent history.
Some of this is true and the achievement must be attributed almost entirely to the Yes campaign. It was a genuinely grassroots popular movement that refused to be cowed by the exclusively financialist neo-liberal arguments of the No campaign whose approach was one of quite astonishing lack of vision, energy and imagination. The final result cannot detract (indeed should be separated) from the new levels of participation that emerged.
But we are left with the question of whether anything can be done to keep this participatory spirit alive? Can we go beyond the Yes/No binary. And say thank you Scotland for reminding us what politics should be. Now please help us in build something new together. Lets not kid ourselves. Our Scottish brethren will only accept that proposition if it comes from the grass roots rather than the political establishment. Sadly the only truly energised grass roots political movement south of the boarder is UKIP- this is not the generous civic nationalism but mean spirited little Englanderism.
Now the colorful inclusive platform of a referendum has been wheeled away and the political class begins its wrangling, will the popular energy also evaporate? I fear that it will - In part because of a factor that we are yet to find a way to manage and that is the fact that in general -we campaign in inspiring poetry but we govern in boring prose-
Are political publics in the end only evanescent entities conjured into existence by particular issues that generate strong desires or fears, only to dissolve as quickly as they arise? What happened to the grass roots movements that brought Obama to power.. so visible in the campaign so absent in the processes of governance ?
Without wishing to fetishise technology, in both the Scottish referendum and Obama’s election, social media played an important role in mobilising new levels of participation. Are there lessons to be learned from frequently denigrated clicktivist platforms such as MoveOn and Avaz? They have not yet succeeded except in isolated instances but there attempts to generate new publics through building committment slowly through incrementalising small levels of participation into something larger shouldn’t be entirely dismissed.
The concessions forced upon Westminster (when it finally woke up) mean that in the coming months and years this dis-united kingdom will be struggling to re-imagine its version of the nation state. Lets hope that’s Scotland’s example of a “civic nationalism” (any Scottish resident had a vote) based on common goods will percolate into the debates to come. It certainly wont happen of its own accord or through the usual party political mechanisms. It will only happen if those who share the aspirations of Scotland’s YESers can ignite a similar level of imagination and aspiration South of the boarder. Its not easy to see how but as the arguments begin making common cause with Scotland’s progressive Yes campaigners might be a place to start.
d a v i d g a r c i a new-tactical-research.co.uk
distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets more info: http://mx.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: firstname.lastname@example.org