Hi All,
Reading Rob's post, I tend to concurr with Katherine Albrecht: don't
confort them, combat them! If we can. If ever we could. On the other hand
I get quite curious about Melanie Riebacks' group. Two questions: are they
open to the 'general public' and non scientific activists? and: can the
device block all, or only certain RFIDs? (leaving the 'legally imposed'
alive). The latter question is a technical one, and probably not
answerable in a clearcut way. The first question is immo more important.
Established academics, esp in the 'hard science' have a very bad track
record when it comes to joining hands with 'civil society' (for want of a
better word). I see they will liaise with Rop Gonggrijp, who is a kind of
in between figure, a 'lay expert', and besides, quite difficult to ignore.
From this and other posts by Rob (just read the last one), I see there is
a realisation that we live in times, different, but comparable, to the
onset of fascism. A new totalitarian era, something witnessed by the large
number of references to exodus, internal exile, small scale community
building, and what have you, up and including suicide. What I also notice,
and it mildly puzzles me, is that the most principled enemies of the new
technological/ technocratic dispensation (which Rop apaarently never tires
to describe as unavoidable and upon us) are coming form the more orthodox
branches of Christianity.
That can be verified in the Netherlands, where the only politician voicing
concerns related to ethics and fundamental (constitutional) rights, is
Andre Rouwvoet, the Christian Union vice prime minister (and minister for
youth and familly affairs). CU is small, and right to the (larger)
Christian Democratic party. This may be should shed light on the 'clueless
politicians' embrassing one after the other technocratic policy: they are
not so much clueless as totally unprincipled, that is: they do not believe
in fundamentals any more.
It is the latter aspect that makes them more immune to the general feeling
of disilusionment about them in so far that it mirrors the position of
their own electorate which has become desilusioned about political life in
general, and especially about their own. Hence, the argument that the
total breakdown of privacy/ generalised surveillance and control will
ultimately be resisted by fed-up citizens is way too optimistic. I think a
majority of the people (though there may be hope with the current
under-20s) have accepted it as unavoidable and relatively benign. Same
applies to the demise of the middle class which has for long also accepted
its fate, among other things because its individual members aspire to move
out and up while fearing to move out and down, which, however is precisely
the fate they ardently wish for their neighbours and will do nothing at
all to prevent.
What to do? Well, surprise, I don't know.
But I will remain critical of all to smooth scenarios and agendas.
A few things you may want to read, if you haven't done already:
Achille Mbembe on 'necro-politics. Going with that, Google for the terms
"necro-capitalism" and "necro-economics"
Read the transcript of Rop Gonggrijp and Frank Riegers CCCongress 2006
speech "We Lost the War".
And Bill Joy's famous "Why the Future doesn't need Us" It';s about
nanotech, but that is closely related with RFID.
(Sorry, you'll have to search for all this, eeezy!)
Cheerio, patrizio and Diiiinooos!
> Hello,
>
> yes i think both tracks can be followed. It is true, as Philippe says
> that the internet as tcp/ip is a fluke, it would never have been around
> had corporate interests been involved. We would have had a Philips web
> in parts of Europe, a Sony web in Japan...This is exactly what GS1 and
> EPC find, up against making the protocol for the Internet of Things,
> that that is not easy when everyone involved knows what is at stake.
> China, for example is rolling out its own RFID infrastructure., talking
> huge numbers of tags:
> http://www.idtechex.com/products/en/view.asp?productcategoryid=138
> in the meanwhile.
>
> One of the things I have been doing in past years is setting p a space
> in which both GS1 Holland, EPC Global and RFID pushers are in with the
> teachers from the students of Nijmegen who hacked/cloned the Ov card,
> designers, and government sponsored bodies who care about privacy. It
> may lead to opening up the infrastructure alongside the principles of
> Melanie Riebacks RFID Guardian (also in that DIFR network),
> http://www.rfidguardian.org/index.php/Main_Page
> it may not. Probably what I may have done during those years is making
> industry a lot wiser. These are the discussions I had with Katherine
> Albrecht (spychips.com) who was very angry that we went talking and
> creating comfort zones with industry - instead of rallying in the
> streets as if we could stop it. However, I see that ship coming in and
> there is no stopping it. I hope through initiatives like this to buy
> some time, divert and create open spaces to discuss an open source rfid
> infrastructure that starts from agency from citizens ( in their terms:
> consumers).
>
> But I agree with Pajé, we should also look past these protocols of
> vested interests whichever way they turn out. That means taking our own
> scenarios seriously. My 'end of the Netherlands' story, predicting
> breakdown in European states because the middle class will pull the
> plug, demanding better service for its 40% taxes to an empty state that
> is dressed in Emperors clothes (money and law from EU, sold all
> services) is getting lots of attention from Dutch policy makers. They
> get itchy. There is just something funny in the air. Votes swing in
> months, people are fed up with politicians. So why not bet on that
> breakdown and take that as a framework for projects in the coming five
> years? That would mean betting to opening up scenarios in other parts of
> the world where bricos are. Globally this would mean to describe the
> generic infrastructures we would need to live everyday lives and then
> simply...make them :)
>
> Greetings, Rob
>
>
> paulo lara schreef:
>> hi there,
>>
>> well, i think there is a bit of misconception about the idea of
>> "freedom" on the internet. First of all, the early discussions about
>> the internet were about State or Market domain. So the wining point
>> was that one named as "libertarian - mcluhanism" (barbrook). So i
>> think it's wrong to think that the liquid, flowting, controls of the
>> marked never does it's movements concearning a restriction and control
>> over these architeture. That freedom was always the liberal freedom
>> from the nineties, the democracy ideology, and the market forms of
>> relation.
>>
>> But most important is to think that this "freendom" was always more
>> consented than conquested. This is the idea of the servo pradrone,
>> where the given ideology make it's domination mainly be the passive
>> agreement of the dominated groups.
>> My point is that there is a new form of domination, that has nothing
>> to deal with the disciplinary domination, as the State or other
>> previous and already known institutions were used to do. And the
>> develompent of this domination it's much larger than the internet
>> governance.
>>
>> There is not a "Internet Dilema" apart from a technological dilema.
>> And the concept of "soviet" do not seem to me the better term to
>> ilustrate the kind of control the new corporations and thecnological
>> power push into our relations. If it were like this, it would be easy
>> for us to stand against.
>>
>> The new project in brasilian senate (see felipe fonseca's last mail)
>> show the ignorance of the political class, but are more related to the
>> pressure and fear concearning the use of new technology, and to me ,
>> their fear is almost useless, because we are not discussing the main
>> subject, that is, for me, the hole economic and cultural logic we are
>> thinking and criticizing, but without being able to see beyond our
>> immediately needs.
>>
>> kisses and beijos,
>>
>> pajé
>>
>> 2008/7/5 Philippe Langlois <Philippe.Langlois@???
>> <mailto:Philippe.Langlois@???>>:
>>
>> During HSF, we spoke a bit (not enough maybe) on how the film/media
>> industry is now lobbying to make the internet become some giant
>> commercial machine monitored and ruled by commercial powers.
>>
>> Benjamin is doing great work at FFII, I don't know if you heard
>> about
>> this so i'm fwd'ing this message from the important mailing list
>> FFII.
>>
>> One remark I made is that I believe Internet would never have worked
>> if these media industry people enforced their control on it from
>> day 1.
>> Can the politics be aware of such?
>> Can Bricolabs mailing list actually flex that muscle and spread the
>> word to people who may help in not going into a Dirtyternet?
>>
>> Love,
>> Phil.
>>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> > From: Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion@???
>> <mailto:bhenrion@???>>
>> > Date: Fri 4 Jul 2008 20:25:35 CEDT
>> > To: news@??? <mailto:news@???>
>> > Subject: [ffii] European Parliament rushes towards Soviet Internet
>> >
>> > PRESS RELEASE -- [ Europe / Economy / Innovation ]
>> >
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> > European Parliament rushes towards Soviet Internet
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> >
>> > Brussels, 04 July 2008 -- Amendments to the European
>> > Telecommunications
>> > directive being rushed through the European Parliament propose a
>> > "Soviet
>> > internet" where software publishers and internet service providers
>> > watch
>> > traffic and data for Hollywood. Software and services that run
>> on the
>> > internet would have to ask for permission of the regulators.
>> >
>> > Some amendments to the European Telecommunications directive allow
>> > administrative authorities in each Member State to define which
>> are
>> > the
>> > authorised software applications for the internet. Parts of the
>> > directive should be implemented by the member states through
>> requiring
>> > specific "technical features" in electronic communications
>> networks.
>> > Live-analysis and filtering compose a pre-requisite for a "Soviet
>> > style"
>> > censorship environment.
>> >
>> > Several committees suggested massive changes to an over complex
>> > Commission proposal. The committee process was hijacked by vested
>> > interests. All amendments of at times questionable quality lack a
>> > legal
>> > impact analysis and sufficient examination. Immature
>> propositions risk
>> > to create an administrative burden and stifle internet innovation.
>> > Overloaded and confused by hundreds of amendments the lobby sets
>> MEPs
>> > under pressure to agree on a poor compromise before the summer
>> break.
>> > All amendments need more thoughtful review so that a mature text
>> > may be
>> > presented to the plenary and MEPs fully understand what they cast
>> > their
>> > vote on in the committee.
>> >
>> > Benjamin Henrion, FFII representative in Brussels, rings the alarm
>> > bell:
>> > "Tomorrow, popular software applications like Skype or even
>> Firefox
>> > might be declared illegal in Europe if they are not certified by
>> an
>> > administrative authority. This is compromising the whole open
>> > development of the internet as we know it today. Once the Soviet
>> Union
>> > required the registration of all typewriters and printing
>> devices with
>> > the authorities."
>> >
>> > Privacy expert Ricardo Cristof Remmert-Fontes comments: "In
>> Germany
>> > Deutsche Telekom is under fierce criticism for alleged spying on
>> > citizens and journalists. In Europe the amendments want to make
>> > spying a
>> > natural obligation for communications providers. The planned
>> > infrastructure of live-analysis and filtering can be used for
>> > mass-surveillance and censorship."
>> >
>> > FFII President Alberto Barrionuevo adds: "The agenda to establish
>> a
>> > Chinese internet wall in Europe is set by few ultra-copyright
>> > lobbyists.
>> > I don't agree to justify their intentions to spy us with the
>> > protection
>> > of copyright. It sets a precedent for market control: regulating
>> large
>> > parts of internet communication, provider contracts, software
>> > development and thus internet businesses. The proposed
>> environment is
>> > threatening all European businesses which need protection from
>> > business
>> > espionage, and be able to use secure virtual private networks
>> (VPNs)
>> > over the internet."
>> >
>> > The FFII therefore asks the Members of the European Parliament
>> to take
>> > more time and reconsider thoughtfully the Telecommunications
>> > proposal as
>> > prepared for voting. Over 300 amendments and fundamental concerns
>> on
>> > different issues, such as free speech, censorship, net
>> neutrality and
>> > trade secrets should be reviewed with greater care. The debate
>> on the
>> > European Telecommunications directives requires more reflection,
>> if it
>> > should lead to a reliable and solid legal base.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> > Background Information
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> >
>> > An Article 2 Compromise Amendment (by British conservative Seyd
>> Kamal
>> > MEP) that changes Directive 2002/58/EC Article 14 says on
>> paragraph 2:
>> >
>> > "Where provisions of this Directive can be implemented only by
>> > requiring specific technical features in electronic
>> communications
>> > networks, Member States shall inform the Commission in
>> accordance
>> > with
>> > the procedure provided for by Directive 98/34/EC of the European
>> > Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 1998 laying down a
>> > procedure
>> > for the provision of information in the field of technical
>> standards
>> > and regulations and of rules on information society services."
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> > Links
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> >
>> > * ITRE-IMCO compromise amendments:
>> > http://www.laquadrature.net/files/amendements-compromis_ITRE-
>> > IMCO_7juil/
>> >
>> > * Permanent link to this press release:
>> > http://press.ffii.org/Press_releases/
>> > European_Parliament_rushes_towards_Soviet_Internet
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> > Contact
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> >
>> > Benjamin Henrion
>> > FFII Brussels
>> > +32-2-414 84 03
>> > +32-484-566109
>> > bhenrion@??? <mailto:bhenrion@???>
>> > (French/English)
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> > About the FFII
>> >
>> ======================================================================
>> > =
>> >
>> > The FFII is a not-for-profit association active in over fifty
>> > countries,
>> > dedicated to the development of information goods for the public
>> > benefit, based on copyright, free competition, and open standards.
>> > More
>> > than 850 members, 3,500 companies and 100,000 supporters have
>> > entrusted
>> > the FFII to act as their voice in public policy questions
>> concerning
>> > exclusion rights (intellectual property) in data processing.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > FFII Press Releases.
>> > (un)subscribe via https://lists.ffii.org/mailman/listinfo/news, or
>> > contact media@??? <mailto:media@???> for more
>> information.
>> >
>>
>> Philippe Langlois
>> Email: Philippe.Langlois@???
>> PGP Key: 8DAEE244
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
>>
>> mQGiBEZlOfwRBADWwC3qwrO5/ESOLM/nKpQ0y86nsOa8Odt3x5UTMYs1mqAHSNU/
>> VV6p2kOJJ+Ks6tHxTKuYSLQcX32hXJ2I5Sv6hCUdC1k+GpbfdvWXLDvug5HoEHY/
>> Y0gH0jv9xRZCSpl7qrvQX7zdvPU3hAbYgDpghdZ99PfqYfYnV53UbKvGlwCg8L6O
>> k3ZlSy+8iccLtcC+4QuwJosEAMtWg0SiipxJmv78Rq2+6dR0Vq6dz28F6TytAJIk
>> eDat9l+AhBT5+hfp+kpnhUhtrg/lKXe5i1TAcjDzxjSvILRPRZrmWkm86hyWCa6a
>> qFekSwoZ6KPJnebgKK9Zbqz4Egz/b+h+l0u3P9707VNINRL9iFzQp/ALYhpBY7hP
>> zYgjBACy4Bml7Uyxuc9sZaHiCiZZD5zVx2j3Liu3jTtZfWS781gFT5jqevhXXCtI
>> hq3m5e42OK1Jm6poEQyBXZlLKI6S6pAq/W4Tdpwzwy5qq/qCs2w+Bd230Atbl9K0
>> Q4CVMeaga+wnsYzWG+iXOJk64hqsnNzLtaZfXMivcnaz2orau7QfUGhpbGlwcGUg
>> TGFuZ2xvaXMgPHBsQHRzdGYubmV0PohgBBMRAgAgBQJGZTn8AhsjBgsJCAcDAgQV
>> AggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQgsw1tY2u4kQ08ACghejw3coXOD15hfuhvzFwl7wG
>> C04AoL1LXVZTzmatyKxN2kZpfTa3Z25ttCFQaGlsaXBwZSBMYW5nbG9pcyA8cGhp
>> bEB0c3RmLm5ldD6IYAQTEQIAIAUCSDFfuQIbIwYLCQgHAwIEFQIIAwQWAgMBAh4B
>> AheAAAoJEILMNbWNruJEAFkAnA6JOobgDIKB5doZJtYAaKhnvccVAKDBA1l5WMnz
>> XvFwApxRpQ3RpmMtBLkEDQRGZTn8EBAA6Iqb8ClxWvCzorX+2t46AYWRxsLBdyeD
>> 8CtJt+A+JnONcPV18xGXtI4h0+lOs3Iw9yp7PTfXvpcrqiezjDMoXe6GUtkI3r9D
>> x2NNhyPtQ0fBqU5JgctpQFsENbpBnzGacIH1/HlwDaUGFNCtHs1sHg/4Wk8JMED2
>> 71QbP1XruZg2XkC0wYcKVyxb5q9m/Wmaa572G+3TsJrbrHl8qC2Aj1tUgPNQs+Bf
>> VEJdtKNZOH7K7T/jxWS4KotcTUEAjsZzts98UIdsNvsPRyYWBHlSPVAsdauAfNbt
>> P8T0Miqo2d4umn3jqK4uToc8VPHnmlCPGg+mrFZo0YCkU7cq4X8sd9Xh8OmiTJsB
>> TFE/Q6b4r1hGR0T7hgh8rXrMyVfy6RFWb8XELamew+XTmVOqu9oAs6nNiM8RTM2Z
>> sVZeF4YtPp5WUM845D+75ig+3qQwpyxWudQoNIHAX+VDo2qt5YI9vwaJaDKlxOOB
>> asvFYL8C2g3/saKIKKRegm3Dl4Pq6ksCmlmeUhzANZxVvLQsAyVprgR9uocOwUQI
>> Ago0p7KKSzg/AEkxFpSUUb2SHgEuxvMFOWM+JqGyboqUE9TTc49unxF+EtWvRYxe
>> c6cSeDP/SS0VZWs6LOqO/jIxNFOWM6XK+t6fCHksWq0nDkmExFJAbP++sWSpfcQS
>> 6vAD+b4OCWMAAwUQAJa/FmsJG6+Xqn6jFHmFfjhMEJML/3kKvu+wPzKQUEYYrXDb
>> 4ML+xK+4/UUMfkyhAQl2yQboat+z8VeMr2Nucc5E31kciNifK5e5BFRSRzuIeZL+
>> E4VYECuqJTMRCQPqTvBJiCGBUNEKupheiVhW8vdoelcGLG3RmpGRA1uOjE2KUsjk
>> gmGD1dyxsaRKVEeKnE37h9pFarVPcIy1yKM9mGxbpWxKn2Hk6GUxOsc9oP7Ry84p
>> lJEJzu94JusoHWojxwS7+90KRp45XN1SYvAsuAIhfdWdJ7zrEHb4PAHV7GE5NklU
>> Y88IDGc7lNbe2NRpZF+okaWfTwO7gWBEa9WvxHv+0S2nGFL9k67X963e99lEA0Rz
>> U27Xr7krwI0GSmLIc7uF7Db94I+OXLxt/8Yda0wvT4b/WMyGK4TyrnYmZ4GW8juN
>> fzzsd6Fjxe2U/mMDpHgcv73fpikAJbF8IWgsaq5EmZch7VWP0bUbkQUP8B5cnERR
>> Swsc5RvLJjSudvZZNMfCNmoVgCPWTxqMSpT48Z10j9R5TYIkcLyBXKu1Uvz+gefe
>> QaWKaACTtRnnErUEr6q7H7Tqo5LOCmjoebS7q91iIZtzp9CU18bwryzj2IonP5Z0
>> nJCpsCNqhOkSdsOwFm79IGR6g3bBHHmWb0QVQ2gJnwJNF6AaVi8RUs1YqyGBiEkE
>> GBECAAkFAkZlOfwCGwwACgkQgsw1tY2u4kQMDwCg2cmM936+jtPNxhjsRqLXD3Fb
>> Iy4AoOiAZ0NWp2MmY5BDDBkgqU2bseLW
>> =6Txo
>> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Philippe Langlois
>> Email: Philippe.Langlois@???
>> <mailto:Philippe.Langlois@???>
>> PGP Key: 8DAEE244
>>
>> -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
>>
>> mQGiBEZlOfwRBADWwC3qwrO5/ESOLM/nKpQ0y86nsOa8Odt3x5UTMYs1mqAHSNU/
>> VV6p2kOJJ+Ks6tHxTKuYSLQcX32hXJ2I5Sv6hCUdC1k+GpbfdvWXLDvug5HoEHY/
>> Y0gH0jv9xRZCSpl7qrvQX7zdvPU3hAbYgDpghdZ99PfqYfYnV53UbKvGlwCg8L6O
>> k3ZlSy+8iccLtcC+4QuwJosEAMtWg0SiipxJmv78Rq2+6dR0Vq6dz28F6TytAJIk
>> eDat9l+AhBT5+hfp+kpnhUhtrg/lKXe5i1TAcjDzxjSvILRPRZrmWkm86hyWCa6a
>> qFekSwoZ6KPJnebgKK9Zbqz4Egz/b+h+l0u3P9707VNINRL9iFzQp/ALYhpBY7hP
>> zYgjBACy4Bml7Uyxuc9sZaHiCiZZD5zVx2j3Liu3jTtZfWS781gFT5jqevhXXCtI
>> hq3m5e42OK1Jm6poEQyBXZlLKI6S6pAq/W4Tdpwzwy5qq/qCs2w+Bd230Atbl9K0
>> Q4CVMeaga+wnsYzWG+iXOJk64hqsnNzLtaZfXMivcnaz2orau7QfUGhpbGlwcGUg
>> TGFuZ2xvaXMgPHBsQHRzdGYubmV0PohgBBMRAgAgBQJGZTn8AhsjBgsJCAcDAgQV
>> AggDBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQgsw1tY2u4kQ08ACghejw3coXOD15hfuhvzFwl7wG
>> C04AoL1LXVZTzmatyKxN2kZpfTa3Z25ttCFQaGlsaXBwZSBMYW5nbG9pcyA8cGhp
>> bEB0c3RmLm5ldD6IYAQTEQIAIAUCSDFfuQIbIwYLCQgHAwIEFQIIAwQWAgMBAh4B
>> AheAAAoJEILMNbWNruJEAFkAnA6JOobgDIKB5doZJtYAaKhnvccVAKDBA1l5WMnz
>> XvFwApxRpQ3RpmMtBLkEDQRGZTn8EBAA6Iqb8ClxWvCzorX+2t46AYWRxsLBdyeD
>> 8CtJt+A+JnONcPV18xGXtI4h0+lOs3Iw9yp7PTfXvpcrqiezjDMoXe6GUtkI3r9D
>> x2NNhyPtQ0fBqU5JgctpQFsENbpBnzGacIH1/HlwDaUGFNCtHs1sHg/4Wk8JMED2
>> 71QbP1XruZg2XkC0wYcKVyxb5q9m/Wmaa572G+3TsJrbrHl8qC2Aj1tUgPNQs+Bf
>> VEJdtKNZOH7K7T/jxWS4KotcTUEAjsZzts98UIdsNvsPRyYWBHlSPVAsdauAfNbt
>> P8T0Miqo2d4umn3jqK4uToc8VPHnmlCPGg+mrFZo0YCkU7cq4X8sd9Xh8OmiTJsB
>> TFE/Q6b4r1hGR0T7hgh8rXrMyVfy6RFWb8XELamew+XTmVOqu9oAs6nNiM8RTM2Z
>> sVZeF4YtPp5WUM845D+75ig+3qQwpyxWudQoNIHAX+VDo2qt5YI9vwaJaDKlxOOB
>> asvFYL8C2g3/saKIKKRegm3Dl4Pq6ksCmlmeUhzANZxVvLQsAyVprgR9uocOwUQI
>> Ago0p7KKSzg/AEkxFpSUUb2SHgEuxvMFOWM+JqGyboqUE9TTc49unxF+EtWvRYxe
>> c6cSeDP/SS0VZWs6LOqO/jIxNFOWM6XK+t6fCHksWq0nDkmExFJAbP++sWSpfcQS
>> 6vAD+b4OCWMAAwUQAJa/FmsJG6+Xqn6jFHmFfjhMEJML/3kKvu+wPzKQUEYYrXDb
>> 4ML+xK+4/UUMfkyhAQl2yQboat+z8VeMr2Nucc5E31kciNifK5e5BFRSRzuIeZL+
>> E4VYECuqJTMRCQPqTvBJiCGBUNEKupheiVhW8vdoelcGLG3RmpGRA1uOjE2KUsjk
>> gmGD1dyxsaRKVEeKnE37h9pFarVPcIy1yKM9mGxbpWxKn2Hk6GUxOsc9oP7Ry84p
>> lJEJzu94JusoHWojxwS7+90KRp45XN1SYvAsuAIhfdWdJ7zrEHb4PAHV7GE5NklU
>> Y88IDGc7lNbe2NRpZF+okaWfTwO7gWBEa9WvxHv+0S2nGFL9k67X963e99lEA0Rz
>> U27Xr7krwI0GSmLIc7uF7Db94I+OXLxt/8Yda0wvT4b/WMyGK4TyrnYmZ4GW8juN
>> fzzsd6Fjxe2U/mMDpHgcv73fpikAJbF8IWgsaq5EmZch7VWP0bUbkQUP8B5cnERR
>> Swsc5RvLJjSudvZZNMfCNmoVgCPWTxqMSpT48Z10j9R5TYIkcLyBXKu1Uvz+gefe
>> QaWKaACTtRnnErUEr6q7H7Tqo5LOCmjoebS7q91iIZtzp9CU18bwryzj2IonP5Z0
>> nJCpsCNqhOkSdsOwFm79IGR6g3bBHHmWb0QVQ2gJnwJNF6AaVi8RUs1YqyGBiEkE
>> GBECAAkFAkZlOfwCGwwACgkQgsw1tY2u4kQMDwCg2cmM936+jtPNxhjsRqLXD3Fb
>> Iy4AoOiAZ0NWp2MmY5BDDBkgqU2bseLW
>> =6Txo
>> -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Brico mailing list
>> Brico@??? <mailto:Brico@???>
>> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> * Linux registered user # 402094
>> * faça e pense rádio livre
>> * leia guimarães rosa, mario quintana e patativa do assaré
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Brico mailing list
>> Brico@???
>> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Brico mailing list
> Brico@???
> http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico
>
>
_______________________________________________
Brico mailing list
Brico@???
http://lists.dyne.org/mailman/listinfo/brico
